How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
W^{1,p}(Omega) is reflexive for 1<p<infinity
Statement
Assume the ultrafilter lemma, DC and HB (The ultrafilter extension principle (UL/BPI), The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain, The real dominated-extension principle as an additional hypothesis over ZF). Let be open, , and let . Then the real Banach space of Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms is reflexive (Reflexivity is surjectivity of the canonical map).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The ultrafilter lemma, DC and HB; an open set , ; and .
The Sobolev norm is the -sum norm over the finitely many multi-indices (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).
is a complete normed space (Integer-order Sobolev spaces are Banach); its statement assumes the Axiom of Choice, used there only to derive Countable Choice, which follows from the DC assumed here (Dependent choice implies countable choice).
For every measure space and every , is reflexive under Countable Choice (Reflexivity of Lp for one less p less infinity), and Countable Choice holds here because DC does (Dependent choice implies countable choice).
Under the ultrafilter lemma, DC and HB, a real Banach space is reflexive if and only if every norm-bounded sequence in has a subsequence converging weakly to a point of (Reflexivity is equivalent to weak subsequential compactness of bounded sequences, Reflexivity is surjectivity of the canonical map).
Under HB, a closed linear subspace of a reflexive Banach space, with the restricted norm, is reflexive (Closed subspaces of reflexive spaces are reflexive).
Proof
The gradient embedding. Write and define for , regarded as an element of the real vector space equipped with the -sum norm . By [F1] the map is linear and for every ; hence is a linear isometry onto its image , and is a Banach space (a finite -sum of the Banach spaces ).
is complete. By [F2] the space is a complete normed space, the Countable Choice needed there being supplied by DC.
Finite sums of reflexive spaces are reflexive. Each factor is reflexive by [F3]; we show that a finite -sum of reflexive Banach spaces is reflexive. For two factors : a bounded sequence in has bounded coordinate sequences, so two successive extractions using [F4] give a subsequence with in and in ; every bounded linear functional on has the form with , bounded by the norm of the functional (restrict the functional to each factor), so and the subsequence converges weakly in ; [F4] then makes reflexive. Induction over the finitely many factors gives the reflexivity of .
is closed. Since is a surjective isometry from the complete space onto by steps 1.1 and 1.2, the space is complete, and a complete subset of the normed space is closed.
is reflexive. By step 2.1 the finite -sum of the reflexive spaces is reflexive.
is reflexive. By steps 2.2 and 3.1, is a closed linear subspace of the reflexive Banach space ; [F5] therefore makes , with the restricted norm, reflexive.
Reflexivity transfers to . The isometry satisfies for the canonical maps: both sides send to the functional on . If is given, then and, being reflexive by step 4.1, for some ; writing gives , hence because is injective. So the canonical map of is surjective, that is, is reflexive.
Depends on
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces are Banach
- Reflexivity of Lp for one less p less infinity
- Closed subspaces of reflexive spaces are reflexive
- Reflexivity is equivalent to weak subsequential compactness of bounded sequences
- Reflexivity is surjectivity of the canonical map
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- The ultrafilter extension principle (UL/BPI)
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- The real dominated-extension principle as an additional hypothesis over ZF
- Dependent choice implies countable choice
- Banach space
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Francesco Paolo Maiale (course by Giovanni Alberti), Lecture Notes Calculus of Variations A, University of Pisa (last update 21 August 2019; complete 149-page notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gerald Teschl, Partial Differential Equations: From Classical to Modern (2026 author manuscript; complete 392-page archived text) (standard reference, not scraped)