Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

W^{1,p}(Omega) is reflexive for 1<p<infinity

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The ultrafilter lemma, DC and HB; an open set Ω⊆Rn, n≥1; and 1<p<∞.

[F1]

The Sobolev norm is the ℓp-sum norm ∥u∥W1,p(Ω)=(∑∣α∣≤1∥Dαu∥Lp(Ω)p)1/p over the finitely many multi-indices ∣α∣≤1 (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).

[F2]

W1,p(Ω) is a complete normed space (Integer-order Sobolev spaces are Banach); its statement assumes the Axiom of Choice, used there only to derive Countable Choice, which follows from the DC assumed here (Dependent choice implies countable choice).

[F3]

For every measure space and every 1<p<∞, Lp is reflexive under Countable Choice (Reflexivity of Lp for one less p less infinity), and Countable Choice holds here because DC does (Dependent choice implies countable choice).

[F4]

Under the ultrafilter lemma, DC and HB, a real Banach space X is reflexive if and only if every norm-bounded sequence in X has a subsequence converging weakly to a point of X (Reflexivity is equivalent to weak subsequential compactness of bounded sequences, Reflexivity is surjectivity of the canonical map).

[F5]

Under HB, a closed linear subspace of a reflexive Banach space, with the restricted norm, is reflexive (Closed subspaces of reflexive spaces are reflexive).

Proof

technique · direct, by embedding $W^{1,p}(\Omega)$ isometrically into a finite product of reflexive $L^p$ spaces
1.1F1F2given

The gradient embedding. Write A1={0,e1,…,en} and define Φ(u):=(Dαu)α∈A1 for u∈W1,p(Ω), regarded as an element of the real vector space Y:=∏α∈A1Lp(Ω) equipped with the ℓp-sum norm ∥(wα)∥Y:=(∑α∥wα∥Lp(Ω)p)1/p. By [F1] the map Φ is linear and ∥Φ(u)∥Y=∥u∥W1,p(Ω) for every u; hence Φ is a linear isometry onto its image S:=Φ(W1,p(Ω)), and Y is a Banach space (a finite ℓp-sum of the Banach spaces Lp(Ω)).

1.2F2given

W1,p(Ω) is complete. By [F2] the space W1,p(Ω) is a complete normed space, the Countable Choice needed there being supplied by DC.

2.1F3F4step 1.1

Finite sums of reflexive spaces are reflexive. Each factor Lp(Ω) is reflexive by [F3]; we show that a finite ℓp-sum of reflexive Banach spaces is reflexive. For two factors X,Z: a bounded sequence in X⊕pZ has bounded coordinate sequences, so two successive extractions using [F4] give a subsequence (xk,zk) with xk⇀x in X and zk⇀z in Z; every bounded linear functional on X⊕pZ has the form (x,z)↦f(x)+g(z) with f∈X∗, g∈Z∗ bounded by the norm of the functional (restrict the functional to each factor), so f(xk)+g(zk)→f(x)+g(z) and the subsequence converges weakly in X⊕pZ; [F4] then makes X⊕pZ reflexive. Induction over the finitely many factors gives the reflexivity of Y.

2.2step 1.1step 1.2

S is closed. Since Φ is a surjective isometry from the complete space W1,p(Ω) onto S by steps 1.1 and 1.2, the space S is complete, and a complete subset of the normed space Y is closed.

3.1step 2.1

Y is reflexive. By step 2.1 the finite ℓp-sum Y of the reflexive spaces Lp(Ω) is reflexive.

4.1F5step 2.2step 3.1

S is reflexive. By steps 2.2 and 3.1, S is a closed linear subspace of the reflexive Banach space Y; [F5] therefore makes S, with the restricted norm, reflexive.

5.1F4step 4.1∎

Reflexivity transfers to W1,p(Ω). The isometry Φ:W1,p(Ω)→S satisfies Φ∗∗∘JW1,p(Ω)=JS∘Φ for the canonical maps: both sides send u to the functional s∗↦s∗(Φ(u)) on S∗. If ψ∈W1,p(Ω)∗∗ is given, then Φ∗∗ψ∈S∗∗ and, S being reflexive by step 4.1, Φ∗∗ψ=JS(s) for some s∈S; writing s=Φ(u) gives JS(Φ(u))=Φ∗∗(JW1,p(Ω)(u)), hence JW1,p(Ω)(u)=ψ because Φ∗∗ is injective. So the canonical map of W1,p(Ω) is surjective, that is, W1,p(Ω) is reflexive.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources