Alphabeta Math
Open problemQuestion: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated‡ sources checked 2026-10-22‡ unresolved
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

This problem is unresolved. Its sources and status may be reviewed, but no solution is accepted here. It cannot be used as a proof premise.

Geodesic X-ray injectivity beyond the absence of conjugate points

Open problem

Let n≥2 and let (Mn,g) be a compact, connected, nonempty smooth Riemannian manifold with smooth boundary. Let ∇ be the unique Levi-Civita connection of g. Write νout for the outward unit normal, and assume g(∇wνout,w)>0 for every nonzero boundary-tangent vector w. Assume every maximal unit-speed geodesic starting in M∘ reaches ∂M in both time directions in finite time; no absence-of-conjugate-points condition is imposed. Set SM={(x,v):x∈M, v∈TxM, gx(v,v)=1}, let νin=−νout, and set ∂+SM={(x,v)∈SM:x∈∂M, gx(v,νin)>0}. For f∈C∞(M) define If(x,v)=∫0τ+(x,v)f(γx,v(t)) dt, where γx,v solves ∇γ˙γ˙=0 with unit speed and initial state (x,v), and τ+(x,v) is its first positive exit time. Is I injective on this class; equivalently, does If=0 on ∂+SM imply f=0 for every such (M,g)?

Status

Status reviewed on 2026-10-21. Salo's RICAM notes and minicourse notes both list injectivity for compact strictly convex nontrapping manifolds as an open question. The transform is injective on the simple class used by the theorem on this page; the notes also give noninjective examples when trapping is allowed, which do not settle this nontrapping question. Higher-dimensional injectivity is known under additional convex-foliation hypotheses, including cases where conjugate points may occur. The 2025 paper inspected here studies microlocal normal-operator structure and cancellation of singularities for tensor transforms with conjugate points; it does not state a general injectivity resolution for the class above. No general resolution was found in the sources checked for this review.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources