How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Does the ordinary A-polynomial detect torus knots?
Open problem
Assume the Axiom of Choice. For a nontrivial torus knot , does equality up to multiplication by a Laurent unit force a knot to be a torus knot? Equivalently, does the ordinary A-polynomial distinguish torus knots from all non-torus knots?
Open problem references
Status
Open. Baldwin–Sivek pose this as Question 1.5 in their 2025 paper. A web search on 2026-10-19 found no later resolution; no proof is asserted here.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John A. Baldwin and Steven Sivek, Torus knots, the A-polynomial, and SL(2,C), Question 1.5 (standard reference, not scraped)