How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Coprime torus knot
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Identify the standard oriented three-sphere with and choose . The standard unknotted Heegaard torus is ; its two sides are solid tori. In the angular coordinates given by , let and be the first and second coordinate classes in . For coprime nonzero integers , the oriented torus knot is the image of , for , oriented by increasing ; it represents the primitive slope . The mirror convention is the reflection , which sends to with image orientation, and reversing the knot orientation gives . For nonzero with , the corresponding torus link is the union of disjoint parallel copies of the primitive slope ; it is not a single embedded curve of class . The exterior is for a chosen closed tubular neighborhood. Orient each normal disk so that a positive tangent vector to followed by a positive basis of the disk gives the orientation of . A positive meridian is the boundary of such a disk with its induced boundary orientation. Let be the projection of the chosen normal-disk tube. A preferred longitude is an oriented simple closed curve for which has degree and in , where is inclusion; this definition alone asserts neither existence nor uniqueness.
Definition references
Diagram
The rectangle is a -by- block of unit fundamental squares in the universal cover of . The segment from to projects to the slope ; its endpoints differ by a lattice vector, so the projection closes on the torus. The picture records the slope only; the proof of embeddedness is the coprimality argument in the Definition.
Depends on
Used by
- Enhanced A-polynomial and Alexander degree identify torus knots Corollary
- Noncoprime torus slopes can be links Counterexample
- A (2,1)-cable of the right trefoil Example
- Worked cases of torus knots Example
- A positive Hopf-plumbed surface for a torus knot Lemma
- Baldwin–Sivek instanton-surgery and Newton-polygon input module Lemma
- Enhanced A-polynomial of a torus knot Lemma
- Epsilon is stable-equivalence invariant but not a homomorphism Lemma
- Sign changes of torus-knot parameters give mirror and reversal Lemma
- Unit-slope torus knots are unknots Lemma
- A-polynomial Newton parallelogram characterization Open problem
- Do exactly two boundary slopes characterize torus knots? Open problem
- Does the ordinary A-polynomial detect torus knots? Open problem
- Infinitely many SL2(C)-abelian surgeries characterize torus knots Theorem
- The enhanced A-polynomial Newton polygon detects torus knots Theorem
- Torus-knot Alexander polynomial and genus formulas Theorem
- Torus-knot exterior group and peripheral system Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alessia Cattabriga and Stefano Francaviglia, Knot Theory and Applications: Lecture Notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Danny Calegari, Introduction to Knot Theory (standard reference, not scraped)