Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compact-group symplectic actions admit an invariant compatible almost-complex structure

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and ACω. Let a compact Lie group G act symplectically on a symplectic manifold (M,ω). Then M carries a G-invariant almost-complex structure J compatible with ω: that is, J2=id, ω(Ju,Jv)=ω(u,v) for all tangent vectors, and (u,v)ω(u,Jv) is a Riemannian metric on M which is also G-invariant.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Axiom of Choice, ACω, a compact Lie group G acting symplectically on (M,ω).

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is The Axiom of Choice and ACω is countable choice.

[A2]

AC is used to obtain the normalized Haar measure and the background Riemannian metric, and ACω is inherited from the fundamental-field interface of the action; no other choice is made.

[F1]

G has a unique regular Borel probability measure μ invariant under left and right translations and inversion, and Gf(hx)dμ(x)=Gf(x)dμ(x) for integrable f. Normalized Haar measure on a compact Lie group, Haar integration is translation and conjugation invariant.

[F2]

Every smooth manifold admits a Riemannian metric. Assuming countable choice, every smooth manifold admits a Riemannian metric.

[F3]

A smooth self-adjoint positive-definite bundle endomorphism has a unique smooth self-adjoint positive-definite square root. Positive-definite bundle endomorphisms have smooth positive square roots.

[F4]

The action is symplectic: agω=ω for all g, where ag(p)=gp. Symplectic and Hamiltonian Lie-group actions.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Choose a background Riemannian metric h0 on M by [F2] and put hp(u,v):=G(agh0)p(u,v)dμ(g). The integrand is smooth in (g,p) and the integral is a finite-dimensional parameter integral, so h is a smooth symmetric bilinear form; it is positive definite because the average of positive numbers is positive, and nondegenerate accordingly.

A2F1F2
2.1

The metric h is G-invariant: for kG, invariance of Haar under left translation gives hkp(d(ak)u,d(ak)v)=G(agkh0)p(u,v)dμ(g)=G(agh0)p(u,v)dμ(h1g)=hp(u,v).

step 1.1F1
2.2

Define a bundle endomorphism A by ωp(u,v)=hp(Apu,v); it exists and is unique because hp is nondegenerate. It is invertible because ωp is nondegenerate, and it is skew-adjoint for h: expanding ωp(u,v)+ωp(v,u)=0 gives hp((Ap+Ap)u,v)=0 for all u,v, hence A=A. Therefore A2=AA is h-positive-definite, and it commutes with A.

step 1.1
3.1

By step 2.2 the endomorphism A2=AA is self-adjoint and positive definite, so [F3] gives its unique smooth self-adjoint positive-definite square root; set J:=A(A2)1/2. Since A commutes with A2 and with its functional calculus, J2=A2(A2)1=id.

step 2.2F3
4.1

Compatibility: from J2=id and A=A one computes ω(Ju,Jv)=ω(u,v) and that (u,v)ω(u,Jv) is symmetric; positivity follows from ω(u,Ju)=h(Au,Ju)=h((A2)1/2u,u)>0 for u0, so gω(u,v):=ω(u,Jv) is a Riemannian metric.

step 3.1
5.1

Invariance: both h and ω are G-invariant, so A is G-equivariant: h(Ad(ag)u,d(ag)v)=ω(d(ag)u,d(ag)v)=ω(u,v)=h(Au,v)=h(d(ag)Au,d(ag)v) for all v, whence Ad(ag)=d(ag)A by nondegeneracy of h. Hence A2 is G-equivariant, its unique positive square root is G-equivariant by uniqueness, and J=A(A2)1/2 is G-equivariant. In particular J and gω are G-invariant.

step 3.1step 4.1F4
6.1

Steps 1.1--2.1 produce an invariant Riemannian metric, steps 2.2--3.1 produce a smooth almost-complex structure J, step 4.1 verifies compatibility with ω, and step 5.1 verifies G-invariance; this proves the claim.

step 4.1step 5.1A1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources