Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compact-group symplectic actions admit an invariant compatible almost-complex structure

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and ACω. Let a compact Lie group G act symplectically on a symplectic manifold (M,ω). Then M carries a G-invariant almost-complex structure J compatible with ω: that is, J2=−id⁡, ω(Ju,Jv)=ω(u,v) for all tangent vectors, and (u,v)↦ω(u,Jv) is a Riemannian metric on M which is also G-invariant.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Axiom of Choice, ACω, a compact Lie group G acting symplectically on (M,ω).

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is The Axiom of Choice and ACω is countable choice.

[A2]

AC is used to obtain the normalized Haar measure and the background Riemannian metric, and ACω is inherited from the fundamental-field interface of the action; no other choice is made.

[F1]

G has a unique regular Borel probability measure μ invariant under left and right translations and inversion, and ∫Gf(hx) dμ(x)=∫Gf(x) dμ(x) for integrable f. Normalized Haar measure on a compact Lie group, Haar integration is translation and conjugation invariant.

[F2]

Every smooth manifold admits a Riemannian metric. Assuming countable choice, every smooth manifold admits a Riemannian metric.

[F3]

A smooth self-adjoint positive-definite bundle endomorphism has a unique smooth self-adjoint positive-definite square root. Positive-definite bundle endomorphisms have smooth positive square roots.

[F4]

The action is symplectic: ag∗ω=ω for all g, where ag(p)=g⋅p. Symplectic and Hamiltonian Lie-group actions.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1A2F1F2

Choose a background Riemannian metric h0 on M by [F2] and put hp(u,v):=∫G(ag∗h0)p(u,v) dμ(g). The integrand is smooth in (g,p) and the integral is a finite-dimensional parameter integral, so h is a smooth symmetric bilinear form; it is positive definite because the average of positive numbers is positive, and nondegenerate accordingly.

2.1step 1.1F1

The metric h is G-invariant: for k∈G, invariance of Haar under left translation gives hk⋅p(d(ak)u,d(ak)v)=∫G(agk∗h0)p(u,v) dμ(g)=∫G(ag∗h0)p(u,v) dμ(h−1g)=hp(u,v).

2.2step 1.1

Define a bundle endomorphism A by ωp(u,v)=hp(Apu,v); it exists and is unique because hp is nondegenerate. It is invertible because ωp is nondegenerate, and it is skew-adjoint for h: expanding ωp(u,v)+ωp(v,u)=0 gives hp((Ap+Ap∗)u,v)=0 for all u,v, hence A∗=−A. Therefore −A2=A∗A is h-positive-definite, and it commutes with A.

3.1step 2.2F3

By step 2.2 the endomorphism −A2=A∗A is self-adjoint and positive definite, so [F3] gives its unique smooth self-adjoint positive-definite square root; set J:=A (−A2)−1/2. Since A commutes with −A2 and with its functional calculus, J2=A2(−A2)−1=−id⁡.

4.1step 3.1

Compatibility: from J2=−id⁡ and A∗=−A one computes ω(Ju,Jv)=ω(u,v) and that (u,v)↦ω(u,Jv) is symmetric; positivity follows from ω(u,Ju)=h(Au,Ju)=h((−A2)1/2u,u)>0 for u≠0, so gω(u,v):=ω(u,Jv) is a Riemannian metric.

5.1step 3.1step 4.1F4

Invariance: both h and ω are G-invariant, so A is G-equivariant: h(Ad(ag)u,d(ag)v)=ω(d(ag)u,d(ag)v)=ω(u,v)=h(Au,v)=h(d(ag)Au,d(ag)v) for all v, whence Ad(ag)=d(ag)A by nondegeneracy of h. Hence −A2 is G-equivariant, its unique positive square root is G-equivariant by uniqueness, and J=A(−A2)−1/2 is G-equivariant. In particular J and gω are G-invariant.

6.1step 4.1step 5.1A1∎

Steps 1.1--2.1 produce an invariant Riemannian metric, steps 2.2--3.1 produce a smooth almost-complex structure J, step 4.1 verifies compatibility with ω, and step 5.1 verifies G-invariance; this proves the claim.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources