Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cotangent pullback is contravariantly functorial

Statement

For smooth maps F:M→N and G:N→P, one has (G∘F)p∗=Fp∗∘GF(p)∗ for every p∈M, and (id⁡M)p∗=id⁡Tp∗M.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Smooth maps F:M→N and G:N→P and a point p∈M.

[F1]

Pullback is defined by composition with the differential (Pullback of a cotangent vector).

[L1]

Differentials satisfy the chain rule (The chain rule for differentials of smooth maps).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1L1given

For ω∈TG(F(p))∗P, one has (G∘F)p∗(ω)=ω∘d(G∘F)p=ω∘dGF(p)∘dFp=Fp∗(GF(p)∗(ω)) by [F1] and [L1].

1.2F1L1given

Applying the same formula to the identity map gives (id⁡M)p∗=id⁡Tp∗M.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2∎

Therefore cotangent pullback is contravariantly functorial.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources