How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Covering spaces are stable under restriction, finite products, and pullback
Statement
Restrictions of coverings to open subspaces, finite products of coverings, and pullbacks of coverings are covering maps. The empty product is the identity covering of a one-point space.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects, hypotheses, and choice principles stated above.
For a covering and a continuous map , define with the subspace topology, and let be (def-product-topology, def-subspace-topology-top). This is the pullback covering space; its covering property is proved in prop-covering-spaces-are-stable-under-restriction-finite-products-and-pullback. (The pullback of a covering space along a continuous map).
A covering map is a continuous surjection such that every has an open neighbourhood for which is a disjoint union of open sets , called sheets, and each restriction is a homeomorphism (def-continuous-map-top, def-homeomorphism-and-open-maps, def-disjoint-union-topology). Such a is evenly covered, and is the fibre over . A covering is trivial when it is isomorphic over to a product projection with discrete. (Covering maps, evenly covered neighbourhoods, fibres, sheets, and trivial coverings).
The product set. Let be a set and let be a set for each . The product is and we write , the -th coordinate of . Two elements of the product are equal exactly when they agree at every index, functions being equal when they have the same domain and the same values. For the -th projection is . The product topology on is the initial topology of the projections: the topology generated by the subbasis . Finite intersections of subbasic sets form a basis for it, and they are exactly the boxes with every open in and for all but finitely many . (The product set of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space).
Let be a topological space (def-topological-space) and let . The subspace topology (also relative topology) on is the family of traces on of the open sets of . The pair is a subspace of . A subset of that lies in is said to be open in , and relatively open where the ambient space needs emphasis. (Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace).
Proof
Restrict an evenly covered neighbourhood for restriction, take products of evenly covered neighbourhoods for finite products, and identify each pullback sheet with the corresponding open subset of the new base.
The preceding construction and implications establish the assertion.
Depends on
- The pullback of a covering space along a continuous map
- Covering maps, evenly covered neighbourhoods, fibres, sheets, and trivial coverings
- The product set $\prod_{i \in I} X_i$ of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space
- Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 34 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, §1.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Peter May, A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology, Ch. 3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Marco Gualtieri, MAT1300 Week 4 Term 2, §1.6 (standard reference, not scraped)