Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Equivariant symplectomorphisms preserve moment maps up to a coadjoint-fixed covector

Statement

Assume ACω and let M be connected. Let (M,ω,G,μ) be a Hamiltonian G-space with equivariant moment map μ, and let ϕ:M→M be a G-equivariant symplectomorphism, so that ϕ(g⋅p)=g⋅ϕ(p) and ϕ∗ω=ω for all g,p. Then

μ∘ϕ−μ=δ

for a constant coadjoint-fixed covector δ∈(g∗)G. Literal preservation holds exactly when δ=0; for example it holds if ϕ has a fixed point in M.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, a connected Hamiltonian G-space (M,ω,G,μ) with equivariant moment map, and a G-equivariant symplectomorphism ϕ.

[A1]

ACω is countable choice; it is used only through the fundamental-field interface cited in [F1].

[F1]

μ is coadjoint equivariant and its components satisfy dμξ=−ιξMω; the action satisfies ϕ∗ω=ω. Symplectic and Hamiltonian Lie-group actions, Moment map, component Hamiltonians and infinitesimal moment maps.

[F2]

ξM(p)=ddt∣0exp⁡G(−tξ)⋅p and dϕ intertwines the differentials of the action maps. Fundamental vector fields for a left action, Smooth left actions of Lie groups.

[F3]

The coadjoint action is (g⋅α)(ζ)=α(Ad⁡g−1ζ). The coadjoint representation, action and orbits.

[F4]

Two equivariant moment maps for the same action on a connected symplectic manifold differ by a constant element of (g∗)G. Moment maps for one action form an affine space over coadjoint-fixed covectors.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2given

For every ξ∈g the fundamental field is ϕ-related to itself: differentiating the identity ϕ(exp⁡G(−tξ)⋅p)=exp⁡G(−tξ)⋅ϕ(p), which holds because ϕ commutes with the action, gives dϕp(ξM(p))=ξM(ϕ(p)).

1.2F1given

The composite μ∘ϕ is coadjoint equivariant: (μ∘ϕ)(g⋅p)=μ(ϕ(g⋅p))=μ(g⋅ϕ(p))=g⋅μ(ϕ(p))=g⋅(μ∘ϕ)(p) for all g,p.

2.1step 1.1F1

The composite satisfies the component moment equations. Indeed, for v∈TpM, d(μ∘ϕ)pξ(v)=dμϕ(p)ξ(dϕpv)=−ωϕ(p)(ξM(ϕ(p)),dϕpv)=−ωϕ(p)(dϕpξM(p),dϕpv)=−ωp(ξM(p),v), where step 1.1 identifies the fundamental field at ϕ(p) with dϕpξM(p) and symplecticity of ϕ removes the differential.

3.1step 1.2step 2.1F4

By steps 1.2 and 2.1 the composite μ∘ϕ is an equivariant moment map for the same action as μ. Both are equivariant moment maps on the connected manifold M, so [F4] provides δ∈(g∗)G with μ∘ϕ−μ=δ.

4.1step 3.1F3A1algebra∎

The difference vanishes exactly when δ=0. Adding any constant covector c to the moment map does not change this difference, because (μ+c)∘ϕ−(μ+c)=μ∘ϕ−μ. If p is a fixed point of ϕ, however, then evaluating step 3.1 at p gives δ=μ(ϕ(p))−μ(p)=0, so μ∘ϕ=μ.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources