Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Equivariant symplectomorphisms preserve moment maps up to a coadjoint-fixed covector

Statement

Assume ACω and let M be connected. Let (M,ω,G,μ) be a Hamiltonian G-space with equivariant moment map μ, and let ϕ:MM be a G-equivariant symplectomorphism, so that ϕ(gp)=gϕ(p) and ϕω=ω for all g,p. Then

μϕμ=δ

for a constant coadjoint-fixed covector δ(g)G. Literal preservation holds exactly when δ=0; for example it holds if ϕ has a fixed point in M.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, a connected Hamiltonian G-space (M,ω,G,μ) with equivariant moment map, and a G-equivariant symplectomorphism ϕ.

[A1]

ACω is countable choice; it is used only through the fundamental-field interface cited in [F1].

[F1]

μ is coadjoint equivariant and its components satisfy dμξ=ιξMω; the action satisfies ϕω=ω. Symplectic and Hamiltonian Lie-group actions, Moment map, component Hamiltonians and infinitesimal moment maps.

[F2]

ξM(p)=ddt0expG(tξ)p and dϕ intertwines the differentials of the action maps. Fundamental vector fields for a left action, Smooth left actions of Lie groups.

[F3]

The coadjoint action is (gα)(ζ)=α(Adg1ζ). The coadjoint representation, action and orbits.

[F4]

Two equivariant moment maps for the same action on a connected symplectic manifold differ by a constant element of (g)G. Moment maps for one action form an affine space over coadjoint-fixed covectors.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For every ξg the fundamental field is ϕ-related to itself: differentiating the identity ϕ(expG(tξ)p)=expG(tξ)ϕ(p), which holds because ϕ commutes with the action, gives dϕp(ξM(p))=ξM(ϕ(p)).

F1F2given
1.2

The composite μϕ is coadjoint equivariant: (μϕ)(gp)=μ(ϕ(gp))=μ(gϕ(p))=gμ(ϕ(p))=g(μϕ)(p) for all g,p.

F1given
2.1

The composite satisfies the component moment equations. Indeed, for vTpM, d(μϕ)pξ(v)=dμϕ(p)ξ(dϕpv)=ωϕ(p)(ξM(ϕ(p)),dϕpv)=ωϕ(p)(dϕpξM(p),dϕpv)=ωp(ξM(p),v), where step 1.1 identifies the fundamental field at ϕ(p) with dϕpξM(p) and symplecticity of ϕ removes the differential.

step 1.1F1
3.1

By steps 1.2 and 2.1 the composite μϕ is an equivariant moment map for the same action as μ. Both are equivariant moment maps on the connected manifold M, so [F4] provides δ(g)G with μϕμ=δ.

step 1.2step 2.1F4
4.1

The difference vanishes exactly when δ=0. Adding any constant covector c to the moment map does not change this difference, because (μ+c)ϕ(μ+c)=μϕμ. If p is a fixed point of ϕ, however, then evaluating step 3.1 at p gives δ=μ(ϕ(p))μ(p)=0, so μϕ=μ.

step 3.1F3A1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources