Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A faithful irreducible is induced from a proper inertia subgroup

Statement

Let G be finite and let A◃G be abelian and noncentral. Every faithful irreducible complex representation V of G is induced from an irreducible representation of a proper inertia subgroup of G.

Facts & Assumptions

[F2]

Irreducible representations of a finite abelian group over a splitting field are one-dimensional (Every irreducible representation of a finite abelian group over a splitting field is one-dimensional); the algebraically closed field C is a splitting field for A.

Proof

Given: V is faithful and irreducible, and λ is a linear constituent of Res⁡AGV.

1.1F1F2given

Complete reducibility [F1] decomposes V∣A into irreducible summands, and [F2] makes every such summand one-dimensional. Thus V∣A is the direct sum of its linear weight spaces. The translates of the λ-weight space are the weight spaces in its G-orbit, and their direct sum is V by irreducibility.

2.1step 1.1given

If the inertia group Gλ were G, every a∈A would act by a scalar on V. Its commutator with every g∈G would then act trivially, so faithfulness would make A central, contrary to hypothesis. Thus Gλ<G.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1given∎

Put W=Vλ. Distinct left cosets of Gλ carry W to distinct A-weight spaces, whose direct sum is V by step 1.1; the usual transversal model therefore identifies Ind⁡GλGW with V. If 0≠U⊆W is a Gλ-submodule, the direct sum of its translates over the left cosets is a nonzero G-submodule of V. Irreducibility makes this sum all of V, and its intersection with W is U, so U=W. Hence the inducing representation W is irreducible, completing the claim.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources