How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Formal equivalence changes the first-order cochain by a Hochschild coboundary
Statement
Let and be formally gauge equivalent differential star products on a real Poisson manifold, with first coefficients and . If their gauge map is , then Consequently and define the same class in , and their skew parts are identical. This is a first-order invariant only; it does not classify full star products.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative real algebra , two differential star products on , and a gauge map as in [F1].
Formal differential star products and first-order normalization: the products are associative, their coefficients are bidifferential, and they preserve the unit.
Formal differential gauge equivalence of star products: , with differential coefficients vanishing on , and .
Hochschild cochains, differential, and Gerstenhaber insertion bracket: for a 1-cochain , .
The shifted Hochschild cochains form a differential graded Lie algebra: , so the normalized multidifferential cocycles modulo coboundaries define the stated Hochschild cohomology group.
Proof
The coefficient of in associativity of is , which is . The same calculation applies to , so both first coefficients are normalized 2-cocycles in the complex of [F4].
Comparing coefficients of in gives .
Expand the defining transformation from [F2] through first order: Applying subtracts , hence by [F3].
Since is commutative, equals . Thus the skew parts of and agree, and their difference is the coboundary . With step 1.1 this proves equality of their classes in the cohomology of [F4].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Maxim Kontsevich, Deformation Quantization of Poisson Manifolds, I (standard reference, not scraped)
- Sarah J. Witherspoon, Hochschild Cohomology for Algebras (standard reference, not scraped)
- Nima Moshayedi, Lectures on Symplectic Geometry, Poisson Geometry, Deformation Quantization and Quantum Field Theory (standard reference, not scraped)