How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The improved NEB monotone branch is generally only first-order consistent
Statement
There is a potential on a collision-free annular sector and a regular MEP with strictly monotone energy on an interior arc such that the improved NEB monotone branch has projected-force error on equal-arc samples. In particular, the improved-tangent NEB force in Finite-budget improved-tangent NEB with a climbing image has no general projected-force consistency bound, even when the curve and potential are smooth and the chord is nondegenerate.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The improved tangent rule in Finite-budget improved-tangent NEB with a climbing image, the normal-projection MEP condition in Regular minimum-energy paths on a declared collision-free tube, and the limit supplier below.
Finite-budget improved-tangent NEB with a climbing image: on a strictly increasing-energy triple, the selected unnormalized tangent is .
Regular minimum-energy paths on a declared collision-free tube: a regular MEP has zero gradient component normal to its true unit tangent.
Centered-tangent string residuals are second-order consistent on a regular MEP: the proved projected-force estimate is for the centered-tangent string discretization.
In this chart and , with and .
Given: A radius , an arc-length coordinate in , and a normal coordinate . Define . This is a smooth injective coordinate chart because and the angle interval has length less than . Put , , and on the chart. The curve is regular and unit speed.
Proof
At , [A1] gives and , an orthonormal coordinate basis. The potential has coordinate derivatives and , so . Therefore its component normal to vanishes and is a regular MEP by [F2].
We have for and for , so the energy is strictly increasing then decreasing. Since with equality exactly at , those two endpoints are global minima on the sector.
On an equal-arc mesh of width in the increasing subarc , [F1] selects the forward chord. For a circle, points in direction , so the angle between its normalized direction and is exactly . The true gradient magnitude there is , and its projection onto the normal complement of has norm .
Fix strictly inside the subarc, so . By [F3], the ratio of this force error to tends to as . The chord length is for small , so there is no tangent degeneracy. A quantity whose ratio to tends to a positive number cannot be ; this proves the claim and, by [F4], distinguishes this one-sided estimate from the centered-string estimate.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Graeme Henkelman and Hannes Jónsson, Improved tangent estimate in the nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths and saddle points (standard reference, not scraped)
- Xuanyu Liu, Huajie Chen, and Christoph Ortner, Convergence of the Discrete Minimum Energy Path (standard reference, not scraped)