Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The improved NEB monotone branch is generally only first-order consistent

Statement

There is a C∞ potential on a collision-free annular sector and a regular MEP with strictly monotone energy on an interior arc such that the improved NEB monotone branch has projected-force error Θ(h) on equal-arc samples. In particular, the improved-tangent NEB force in Finite-budget improved-tangent NEB with a climbing image has no general O(h2) projected-force consistency bound, even when the curve and potential are smooth and the chord is nondegenerate.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The improved tangent rule in Finite-budget improved-tangent NEB with a climbing image, the normal-projection MEP condition in Regular minimum-energy paths on a declared collision-free tube, and the limit supplier below.

[F1]

Finite-budget improved-tangent NEB with a climbing image: on a strictly increasing-energy triple, the selected unnormalized tangent is Δi+=Ri+1−Ri.

[F2]

Regular minimum-energy paths on a declared collision-free tube: a regular MEP has zero gradient component normal to its true unit tangent.

[F3]

The limit of sin x divided by x at zero is one: lim⁡u→0sin⁡(u)/u=1.

[F4]

Centered-tangent string residuals are second-order consistent on a regular MEP: the proved O(h2) projected-force estimate is for the centered-tangent string discretization.

[A1]

In this chart ∂sX=((R0+n)/R0)T(s) and ∂nX=N(s), with T(s)=(−sin⁡(s/R0),cos⁡(s/R0)) and N(s)=(cos⁡(s/R0),sin⁡(s/R0)).

Given: A radius R0>0, an arc-length coordinate s in (−R0π/4,R0π/4), and a normal coordinate n∈(−R0/4,R0/4). Define X(s,n)=(R0+n)(cos⁡(s/R0),sin⁡(s/R0)). This is a smooth injective coordinate chart because R0+n>0 and the angle interval has length less than 2π. Put a=R0π/6, W(s)=(s2−a2)2, and V(X(s,n))=W(s)+12n2 on the chart. The curve R(s)=X(s,0) is regular and unit speed.

Proof

1.1A1F2givenconstructalgebra

At n=0, [A1] gives ∂sX=T(s) and ∂nX=N(s), an orthonormal coordinate basis. The potential has coordinate derivatives ∂sV=W′(s) and ∂nV=n=0, so ∇V(R(s))=W′(s)T(s). Therefore its component normal to T(s) vanishes and R is a regular MEP by [F2].

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

We have W′(s)=4s(s2−a2)>0 for −a<s<0 and W′(s)<0 for 0<s<a, so the energy is strictly increasing then decreasing. Since V=W(s)+n2/2≥0 with equality exactly at (s,n)=(±a,0), those two endpoints are global minima on the sector.

2.2A1F1step 1.1algebra

On an equal-arc mesh of width h in the increasing subarc (−a,0), [F1] selects the forward chord. For a circle, R(s+h)−R(s) points in direction T(s+h/2), so the angle between its normalized direction and T(s) is exactly h/(2R0). The true gradient magnitude there is ∣W′(s)∣, and its projection onto the normal complement of T(s+h/2) has norm ∣W′(s)∣sin⁡(h/(2R0)).

3.1F3F4step 2.2algebra∎

Fix s strictly inside the subarc, so ∣W′(s)∣>0. By [F3], the ratio of this force error to h tends to ∣W′(s)∣/(2R0)>0 as h→0. The chord length is 2R0sin⁡(h/(2R0))>0 for small h, so there is no tangent degeneracy. A quantity whose ratio to h tends to a positive number cannot be O(h2); this proves the claim and, by [F4], distinguishes this one-sided estimate from the centered-string estimate.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources