Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Centered-tangent string residuals are second-order consistent on a regular MEP

Statement

Let L>0, let M≥2 be an integer, and let R be a regular MEP as in Regular minimum-energy paths on a declared collision-free tube, now parameterized by arc length on [0,L], with R∈C3 under the endpoint convention of Polyline interpolation and equal-length redistribution approximate a smooth arc-length path and the derivative bounds of Second-order centered and unequal-step tangent estimates and Polyline interpolation and equal-length redistribution approximate a smooth arc-length path. Assume the cited lemmas' mesh-size conditions hold, in particular M3h2/6≤1/2, every interior centered chord is nonzero, and 0<h≤1. Let Ri=R(ih) for i=0,…,M, Mh=L, and suppose ∥∇V(R(s))∥2≤G along the curve. Use the centered unit tangent t^i=(Ri+1−Ri−1)/∥Ri+1−Ri−1∥2, and define the adjacent chord lengths ℓi+=∥Ri+1−Ri∥2 and ℓi−=∥Ri−Ri−1∥2. Then the projected string force at each interior sample satisfies

∥(I−t^it^iT)∇V(Ri)∥2≤CFh2.

If the equal-spacing spring residual k(ℓi+−ℓi−)t^i is also evaluated on these samples, then its norm is at most CSh3 for any fixed k∈R, with CS=2∣k∣C1. Equal-length polyline redistribution of the exact samples changes each image by at most CRh2. The constants depend on the stated derivative bounds, G, ∣k∣, and the path, not on M. The projected-force conclusion is for the centered-tangent string residual; it does not assert second-order consistency for the improved energy-selected NEB tangent.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The C3 unit-speed regular MEP, mesh, derivative bounds, and gradient bound in the Statement.

[F1]

Regular minimum-energy paths on a declared collision-free tube: Pt(s)⊥∇V(R(s))=0 and t(s)=R′(s) for the unit-speed parameterization.

[F2]

Second-order centered and unequal-step tangent estimates: the open-interval C3 extension, bounded third derivatives, and M3h2/6≤1/2 give ∥t^i−t(ih)∥2≤Cth2 for the centered chord.

[F3]

Polyline interpolation and equal-length redistribution approximate a smooth arc-length path: under its endpoint C3 convention, sampled chord lengths satisfy ∣ℓi−h∣≤C1h3, and equal-length interpolation has image error at most CRh2.

[F4]

Finite-image projected-gradient string with arc-length redistribution: the string residual uses the normal projection formed from the centered chord, with endpoints fixed and linear equal-length redistribution.

Given: The data and conventions in the Statement.

Proof

1.1F1F2F5givenalgebra

For any vector w, (uuT−vvT)w=(u−v)(uTw)+v((u−v)Tw). Since u and v are unit vectors, [F5] and the triangle inequality give ∥(uuT−vvT)w∥2≤2∥u−v∥2∥w∥2. Apply this with u=t^i, v=t(ih), and w=∇V(Ri). Since Pv⊥∇V(Ri)=0 by [F1], we obtain ∥Pt^i⊥∇V(Ri)∥2≤2G∥t^i−t(ih)∥2≤2GCth2.

1.2F3givenalgebra

By [F3], write each neighboring chord length as ℓi±=h+ei± with ∣ei±∣≤C1h3. Hence the spring residual has norm ∣k∣ ∣ℓi+−ℓi−∣≤2∣k∣C1h3, because the triangle inequality bounds the difference by ∣ei+∣+∣ei−∣.

2.1F3F4step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

The spring term is tangent and has the bound in step 1.2; the normal component has the bound in step 1.1. Since h≤1, h3≤h2, so their sum is bounded by (2GCt+2∣k∣C1)h2. The string redistribution error is the last assertion of [F3]. These statements concern the centered-tangent string discretization specified by [F4]; the improved NEB tangent is a different branch and is treated separately.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources