How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Second-order centered and unequal-step tangent estimates
Statement
Let be a unit-speed curve on an open interval containing . Let be an interval on which . For the centered estimate, take and with and define
If , then and
For the unequal-step estimate, take positive with and define
If , then it is nonzero and its unit normalization differs from by at most . In particular, equal steps give an unit-tangent error; quasiuniform unequal steps give an error. No second-order claim is made for a one-sided tangent branch.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The unit-speed curve, stencil bounds and steps in the Statement.
Regular minimum-energy paths on a declared collision-free tube defines the unit tangent of a regular path as . For the present curve, the separate unit-speed hypothesis means on all of , so its unit tangent there is .
Multivariable Taylor formula with a Lagrange remainder along a line segment: applied coordinatewise to a curve, the degree-two Taylor remainder at displacement is bounded in Euclidean norm by under the stated coordinate bound.
The interval lies in the domain of the curve and every coordinate third derivative satisfies for ; the convention is maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space.
Given: The hypotheses of the Statement.
Proof
Taylor's formula [F2] at and gives with by [A1]. Subtracting cancels the second-derivative terms, so and .
For unequal steps, write and with by [A1, F2]. Substitution into gives coefficient on and on ; the two remainder coefficients yield .
Since , step 1.1 gives , so . Moreover, , and therefore .
The same normalization argument as in step 2.1, using , gives nonzero and normalized error at most . Setting recovers the centered formula, and if both steps are bounded by a fixed multiple of their maximum mesh size, their product is .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Weinan E, Weiqing Ren, and Eric Vanden-Eijnden, String method for the study of rare events (standard reference, not scraped)
- Weinan E, Weiqing Ren, and Eric Vanden-Eijnden, Simplified and improved string method for computing the minimum energy paths in barrier-crossing events (standard reference, not scraped)