Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-21
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Riemann area between continuous graphs equals Jordan content

Statement

Let a<b, let α,β:[a,b]R be continuous with αβ, and set

K:={(x,y):axb, α(x)yβ(x)}.

Then K is compact and Jordan measurable. Its Jordan content equals its Riemann area between continuous graphs (Riemann area between two continuous graphs and the disc as a vertically simple region):

cont(K)=ab(β(x)α(x))dx.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Reals a<b and continuous functions αβ on [a,b], with K as in the Statement.

[L1]
[L2]

For a continuous H:KR, that theorem gives KH=ab(α(x)β(x)H(x,y)dy)dx (A region between two continuous graphs is Jordan measurable, and a continuous integrand extending to its closure integrates by vertical sections).

[L3]

If E is Jordan measurable, then the integral of its indicator over a bounding rectangle equals cont(E) (A bounded set is Jordan measurable iff its indicator is Riemann integrable, and the integral is its Jordan content).

[L4]

The Riemann area between continuous graphs αβ on [a,b] is ab(β(x)α(x))dx (Riemann area between two continuous graphs and the disc as a vertically simple region).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Apply [L2] to the constant function H=1 on the compact Jordan set supplied by [L1]; by [L3], the left side is cont(K), while the right side is ab(α(x)β(x)1dy)dx.

L1L2L3
2.1

The inner integral is β(x)α(x), including a zero contribution when the two graphs coincide, so step 1.1 is exactly [L4] and proves the formula.

step 1.1L4

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources