Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Characteristic-class constructions and normalizations are owned by algebraic topology

Interface

The Stiefel-Whitney, Chern, Pontryagin and Euler classes, the Thom class, and the universal Whitney-sum and naturality identities used on this page are constructed and proved on the algebraic-topology pages stiefel-whitney-and-euler-classes-by-universal-constructions, chern-and-pontryagin-classes-by-splitting-and-complexification and leray-hirsch-thom-isomorphism-and-gysin-sequences. This page does not construct them again: it cites the exact item ids, in particular Stiefel–Whitney classes from the projective-bundle relation, Pontryagin classes by complexification, Thom class by fiberwise normalization and Naturality, stability, and mod-two reduction of Pontryagin classes, and uses the published normalization conventions: the complexification convention pi(E)=(−1)ic2i(EC) for Pontryagin classes and the sign carried by the Euler class under orientation reversal. It never appeals to differential-form representatives. The Stiefel-Whitney and Pontryagin numbers Stiefel-Whitney numbers of a closed manifold, Pontryagin numbers of a closed oriented manifold are the published evaluations on fundamental classes; this page adds their evaluations and boundary/product computations, as well as the Pontryagin-Thom and bordism-detection arguments. No choice principle is used beyond the AC inherited from those pages, and this remark is not a proof input to any item.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources