How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Stiefel–Whitney classes from the projective-bundle relation
Definition
Assume AC, let be a numerable real vector bundle of rank over a paracompact Hausdorff CGWH base of CW homotopy type (an admissible base on this page), and let be its tautological degree-one class. By Mod-two real projective bundle theorem there are unique classes , , with The Stiefel–Whitney classes of are these coefficients: The definition is completed by the conventions and for , and the total Stiefel–Whitney class is the finite sum For the zero bundle of rank the conventions give .
Applying the definition to a line bundle : here , over and under that identification, so the relation is , that is, , and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a numerable real rank- bundle with over a paracompact Hausdorff CGWH base of CW homotopy type, its projective bundle, and the class .
Under AC, for a numerable positive-rank real bundle over a paracompact Hausdorff CGWH base of CW homotopy type, is free over on , and there is a unique monic degree- relation with , which generates all polynomial relations (Mod-two real projective bundle theorem).
For a rank-one bundle , the projection is a homeomorphism over and corresponds to (Real projective bundle and tautological line).
AC is the Axiom of Choice in the form fixed by The Axiom of Choice.
Verification
The classes are well defined and have the asserted degrees and conventions. Existence and uniqueness of the coefficients is [F1], so each is a single well-defined element of ; the relation is monic because its -coefficient is . The conventions and for extend the definition to all indices, and the total class is the finite sum of the nonzero terms, so it is a class in . For the zero bundle no positive coefficients exist and the total class is . The construction consumes AC only through [F1].
The rank-one case. Let be a numerable real line bundle. By [F2], over and the tautological line is , so and the defining relation of [F1] reads in . Since in , this gives ; the conventions give for and .
Boundary cases. In rank one the fiber is a point, so the base of the relation is the whole base and the displayed computation is literal. Over the empty base every group is zero, the relation is the zero relation, and the conventions give the zero classes with in the zero ring. The rank-zero convention is the unit, matching the degree-zero convention used in every rank.
Depends on
Used by
- High normal Stiefel-Whitney classes obstruct low-codimension immersions Corollary
- Top normal classes vanish for Euclidean embeddings Corollary
- An odd-rank Euler class need not vanish in the presence of two-torsion Counterexample
- The Mobius core circle has no integral oriented self-intersection but mod two data survives Counterexample
- The real projective plane is not unoriented null-cobordant Counterexample
- The tangent bundle of RP² is not Spin Counterexample
- Normal Stiefel-Whitney and Pontryagin classes of a closed manifold Definition
- Real flag bundle and Stiefel–Whitney roots Definition
- Singular instanton knot and sutured closure data Definition
- Stiefel-Whitney numbers of a closed manifold Definition
- Stiefel-Whitney numbers of real projective space Example
- Stiefel–Whitney class of the universal real line Example
- Integral powers of the complexified universal real line Lemma
- Pontryagin-Thom converts bordism detection to a Thom-space homotopy problem Lemma
- Spin structures exist exactly when w₂ vanishes and then form an H¹ torsor Lemma
- Stable universal Thom cohomology is eventually constant in every degree Lemma
- Stiefel-Whitney classes of the tangent bundle of real projective space Lemma
- The normal Stiefel-Whitney class is the multiplicative inverse of the tangent class Lemma
- The zero section proves injectivity of the Thom unit orbit Lemma
- Boundaries have zero Stiefel-Whitney numbers Proposition
- The first Stiefel–Whitney class classifies orientability Proposition
- The mod two self-intersection is the top Stiefel-Whitney evaluation Proposition
- Characteristic-class constructions and normalizations are owned by algebraic topology Remark
- Real characteristic forms do not detect integral torsion Remark
- The characteristic-class construction is cited, not rebuilt Remark
- Vanishing primary and characteristic obstructions do not classify embeddings Remark
- Mod-two cohomology of BO(n) Theorem
- Mod-two reduction of Chern classes Theorem
- Naturality of Stiefel–Whitney classes Theorem
- Naturality, stability, and mod-two reduction of Pontryagin classes Theorem
- Real projective space Stiefel-Whitney non-immersion obstruction Theorem
- The mod-two Euler class is the top Stiefel–Whitney class Theorem
- Thom identity for Stiefel–Whitney classes Theorem
- Uniqueness of Stiefel–Whitney classes from normalization, naturality, and sum Theorem
- Whitney sum formula for Stiefel–Whitney classes Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Vector Bundles & K-Theory (standard reference, not scraped)
- Haynes Miller, MIT 18.906 Algebraic Topology II lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Milnor and Stasheff, Characteristic Classes (standard reference, not scraped)