Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Uniqueness of Stiefel–Whitney classes from normalization, naturality, and sum

Statement

Assume AC. Let w be a rule assigning to every isomorphism class of numerable real vector bundles EB over an admissible base a total class w(E)H(B;F2) such that

  1. the degree-zero part of w(E) is 1 and w(E) has finite degree bounded by the rank of E;
  2. w is natural: w(fE)=fw(E) for every map f of admissible bases;
  3. w is multiplicative: w(EF)=w(E)w(F) for bundles over one base;
  4. w(γ1)=1+a for the tautological line γ1RP, where a generates H1(RP;F2).

Then w=w: the rule agrees with the total Stiefel–Whitney class of Stiefel–Whitney classes from the projective-bundle relation on every numerable real bundle over an admissible base, and wi(E)=0 for i greater than the rank of E.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a rule w satisfying the four clauses of the statement, and a numerable real bundle EB of rank n0 over an admissible base.

[F1]

The universal line γ1RP has H(RP;F2)=F2[a] with a=1, and the Stiefel–Whitney classes of a line bundle L are w0(L)=1, w1(L)=xL and wi(L)=0 for i2, where xL is computed from a classifying map of L (Mod-two cohomology ring of infinite real projective space, Stiefel–Whitney classes from the projective-bundle relation).

[F2]

By naturality, a line bundle L over an admissible base with classifying map c (a map with cγ1L, available from the numeration) satisfies w1(L)=ca and w(L)=cw(γ1) (Tautological degree-one class on a real projective bundle, Naturality of Stiefel–Whitney classes).

[F3]

The flag bundle q:Fl(E)B is an admissible base with qEL1Ln and q injective on F2-cohomology (Real flag bundle and Stiefel–Whitney roots, Real splitting principle with mod-two injective pullback).

[F4]

The Stiefel–Whitney class satisfies naturality, the Whitney product formula and w(γ1)=1+a (Whitney sum formula for Stiefel–Whitney classes, Naturality of Stiefel–Whitney classes, Stiefel–Whitney classes from the projective-bundle relation).

[A1]

AC is the Axiom of Choice in the form fixed by The Axiom of Choice.

Proof

1.1

The rule is determined on line bundles. Let LB be a numerable real line bundle with classifying map c, so cγ1L. Then naturality of w and the normalization w(γ1)=1+a give w(L)=w(cγ1)=cw(γ1)=c(1+a)=1+ca=1+w1(L), where the last equality is [F2]. Hence w(L)=w(L) for every line bundle, including the trivial line, for which c is nullhomotopic and w1=0.

F1F2
2.1

The rule is determined on every bundle. Let EB have rank n0 and let q:Fl(E)B be its flag bundle, with qEL1Ln and q injective. Iterating multiplicativity of w over the successive summands gives w(qE)=j=1nw(Lj), where the empty product for n=0 is 1; by step 1.1 and [F1] this is j=1n(1+w1(Lj))=w(L1Ln)=w(qE), the last equality by the Whitney formula and [F1]. On the other hand naturality of both rules gives w(qE)=qw(E) and w(qE)=qw(E), so qw(E)=qw(E); injectivity of q gives w(E)=w(E). For n=0 the bundle is the zero bundle, Fl(E)=B, and both rules give 1 by their degree-zero normalization, so the identity is literal.

F1F3F4step 1.1
3.1

The rank bound. Since w=w by step 2.1 and the classes wi(E) vanish for i>n by the rank convention of their definition, also wi(E)=0 for i>n. Combined with clause 1 of the statement this shows the rule is exactly the total class computed from the projective-bundle relation, whose coefficients are the classes wi.

F1F3step 2.1
4.1

Boundary cases. For rank n=1 the flag bundle is B up to the identification P(L)B, the splitting is qLL1 with L1L, and step 2.1 reduces to step 1.1. For the empty base all groups vanish and both rules give the zero class with degree-zero part the zero-ring unit. The normalization clause 4 is exactly the universal case of step 1.1 over RP, and the tautological line is the line bundle with classifying map the identity. AC is used through the splitting principle of [F3], as recorded.

F1F2F3A1step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources