How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Real splitting principle with mod-two injective pullback
Statement
Assume AC. Let be a numerable real vector bundle of rank over a paracompact Hausdorff CGWH base of CW homotopy type, and let be its real flag bundle. Then is a base of the same kind, and the pullback is injective. Moreover, finitely many numerable real bundles over admit a common paracompact Hausdorff CGWH base of CW homotopy type with over which every splits as a sum of line bundles and whose projection induces an injection on -cohomology.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a numerable real rank- bundle over a paracompact Hausdorff CGWH base of CW homotopy type, and its flag bundle .
The flag bundle is built as the composite of the projections , each of which is the projective bundle of a numerable real bundle of positive rank , and (Real flag bundle and Stiefel–Whitney roots).
For a numerable real rank- bundle with over a paracompact Hausdorff CGWH base of CW homotopy type, the projective bundle theorem gives free over on ; in particular the projection induces an injection on -cohomology, as the inclusion of the coefficient-of- summand (Mod-two real projective bundle theorem).
Every intermediate and is paracompact Hausdorff CGWH of CW homotopy type, and a fiber product over of finitely many flag bundles is a numerable bundle with compact CW fiber over , hence has the same properties (Compact-fibre bundle totals preserve paracompactness, and CW type under CW-type hypotheses).
Pullback is canonically functorial and compatible with direct sums, so the splitting of a pulled-back bundle is the pullback of the splitting (Vector-bundle pullback is canonically functorial, Whitney sum, tensor, dual, Hom, and exterior-power bundles).
AC is the Axiom of Choice in the form fixed by The Axiom of Choice.
Proof
Every stage projection is injective on -cohomology. By [F1] the map is the projection of a projective bundle of a numerable bundle of positive rank over , and is admissible by [F3]; [F2] therefore makes the induced map injective. The composite of finitely many injective maps is injective, so is injective.
The splitting over the flag bundle is [F1]'s second clause, , with each a numerable line bundle over the admissible space . For , and the sum is empty, so and the pullback is the identity, which is injective.
Finitely many bundles. Let be numerable real bundles over , of ranks . Define and recursively We first verify the required base change. For a map and a positive-rank bundle , there is a fiberwise map Over a linear chart , both sides have the pulled-back projective chart and is the identity in these coordinates. Thus is a homeomorphism over , and the same coordinate description identifies with the pullback of . Choose at each flag stage the pullback of the metric used over . Fiberwise orthogonal complement then commutes with pullback, because both subbundles consist of the vectors orthogonal to the same pulled-back line. Induction through the projectivization stages of [F1] therefore gives with its tautological lines identified with the pulled-back ones.
Apply this with and . It identifies with the flag projection of , so step 1.1 over the admissible base makes every injective. With and , contravariance gives a composite of injective maps. By [F3] every , and in particular , is admissible. For each , let be the -th projection. Then and , which by [F4] is a direct sum of the line bundles . [F1, F3, F4, step 1.1]
Boundary cases. If some then is the zero bundle, its flag bundle is and splits as an empty sum; the corresponding factor contributes no projection and does not affect injectivity. If then , the empty family of bundles is split vacuously, and . If then all spaces are empty and the cohomology groups are zero, so injectivity is vacuous. AC is used through the metric choices of the flag construction and the projective bundle theorem, as recorded.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Vector Bundles & K-Theory (standard reference, not scraped)
- Haynes Miller, MIT 18.906 Algebraic Topology II lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Milnor and Stasheff, Characteristic Classes (standard reference, not scraped)