How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Under choice, every metric space has a -discrete basis
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Every metric space has a -discrete open basis.
Not proved in this library. This is a source-backed fallback rather than a local proof. The discarded construction assigns every point to a first centre and then asserts that the resulting cells are open. They need not be: in , with integer centres at scale ordered , the cell assigned to is . Intersecting it with a positive-distance condition does not repair that failure.
Why it remains visible. Bing's standard necessity direction needs a real discrete-open refinement argument. The external-dependency marker is retained on this result and its consequences so that none of them is mistaken for a locally established theorem.
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.
Sources
- R. H. Bing, Metrization of Topological Spaces (standard reference, not scraped)