How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Existing polynomial identity bounds
Discussion
The existing A nonzero polynomial of degree over an integral domain has at most distinct roots says that a nonzero univariate polynomial of degree over an integral domain has at most distinct roots. A field is an integral domain: if and , multiplication by gives .
A nonzero formal polynomial of total degree at most over a field vanishes at a uniform point of with probability at most , for nonempty finite . Here total degree and coefficient expansions are as in Monomials, coefficients, degree in each variable and total degree in . To see the bound directly, induct on . For a nonzero constant never vanishes. For , write with . The total degree of is at most , so the induction hypothesis bounds the fraction of points of where it vanishes by . At each remaining point the specialization in has degree and at most roots by the root bound. Splitting the finite set into these two cases gives a vanishing fraction at most . This argument is finite counting and uses no Axiom of Choice.
Apply such bounds to a nonzero difference of formal polynomials. Individual degree bounds concern one variable at a time; total degree bounds concern sums of exponents within a monomial. Sum-check's round comparison is univariate and needs only the root bound. When a degree bound is at least the field size, the resulting probability bound may be vacuous. Distinct formal polynomials over a finite field need not define distinct functions on the whole field.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Justin Thaler, Proofs, Arguments, and Zero-Knowledge (2023), §3.4, Lemma 3.3, p.28 (standard reference, not scraped)