How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A functor between additive categories is additive exactly when it preserves finite biproducts
Statement
For a functor between additive categories, the following are equivalent:
- the functor is additive;
- the functor preserves finite biproducts.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A functor between additive categories.
Additive functors preserve finite biproducts (An additive functor preserves finite biproducts).
Additive categories are preadditive with finite biproducts (Additive category).
In a preadditive category, finite products are automatically biproducts (In a preadditive category, a finite product is automatically a biproduct).
In an additive category, the preadditive hom-group law is a bilinear commutative-monoid enrichment compatible with the finite biproduct diagrams. Indeed, product uniqueness gives , and bilinearity then gives . By uniqueness this is the canonical biproduct addition (The commutative-monoid enrichment of a category with finite biproducts is unique).
Proof
The implication from 1 to 2 is exactly [L1].
Assume preserves finite biproducts. In an additive category, for parallel morphisms , the pairing into is the unique morphism with projections and , and the codiagonal is the unique morphism with both composites equal to . Since preserves the relevant biproducts, it preserves those pairings and codiagonals.
By [L4], the hom-group addition in an additive category is the canonical biproduct addition. [L2, L4, step 1.2] . Step 1.2 therefore gives . So is additive.
Steps 1.1 and 1.3 prove the equivalence.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Section 12.7, Lemma 12.7.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Merlin Christ, Tobias Dyckerhoff, and Tashi Walde, Lax Additivity, Corollary 2.5(2) (standard reference, not scraped)