How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A wide coherent blockade contains a blockade-rainbow copy of a forest
Statement
Let be a forest on vertices , and let be a blockade in a graph . Suppose that for every distinct ,
- is complete to when ; and
- is anticomplete to when .
Then contains a -rainbow induced copy of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A forest on vertices , a graph , and a blockade satisfying the two displayed cross-block conditions.
A -rainbow induced copy of means an induced copy lying in and using at most one vertex from each block (A blockade-rainbow induced copy).
Every block of a blockade is nonempty (Blockades, their length, their width, and their support).
Proof
By [F1], choose vertices for every . Let . Because the blocks are pairwise disjoint, these vertices are distinct.
For distinct , the hypothesis says that and are adjacent exactly when and are adjacent in . Hence the map is an adjacency-preserving and nonadjacency-preserving bijection from to , so is an induced copy of .
The copy lies in and uses exactly one vertex from each block, so [L1] shows that it is -rainbow.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Maria Chudnovsky, Alex Scott, Paul Seymour, and Sophie Spirkl, Pure pairs. I. Trees and linear anticomplete pairs, Theorem 2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Maria Chudnovsky, Alex Scott, Paul Seymour, and Sophie Spirkl, Erdős-Hajnal for graphs with no 5-hole, Theorem 6.3 (standard reference, not scraped)