How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
All-real-set measurability yields an inaccessible inner model
Statement
If a universe satisfies ZF+DC and every set of reals is Lebesgue measurable, then its constructible universe satisfies ZFC and contains an inaccessible cardinal — indeed the ambient is inaccessible in . Consequently the assumed universe has a definable inner model of ZFC with an inaccessible cardinal. No arithmetized consistency implication is asserted by this item.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A universe with ZF+DC in which every set of reals is Lebesgue measurable.
AC implies DC implies countable choice: DC implies Countable Choice.
Boldface Sigma-one-three measurability: boldface measurability means that every set is Lebesgue measurable for every real ; universal measurability of all real sets immediately implies it, since every set is a set of reals.
Sigma-one-three measurability makes omega-one inaccessible in L: under ZF+Countable Choice and boldface measurability, the ambient is inaccessible in .
Semantic and formal inner-model theorem for L with The constructible universe satisfies AC: for each fixed ZFC axiom, ZF proves that axiom relativized to its constructible class ; in particular the ambient ZF universe proves internally that satisfies ZFC. The separate external set-model clause of the first supplier is not applied to the proper class .
Inaccessible and Mahlo cardinals: the definition of inaccessibility, so that the same ordinal certified in [F3] is verified to be uncountable, regular and a strong limit inside .
Proof
DC implies Countable Choice by [F1], so the choice hypothesis of [F3] holds in .
Every set of reals is measurable, hence every set is measurable for every real by [F2]; thus satisfies boldface measurability.
By [F3] the ambient is inaccessible in .
Apply the fixed-axiom relativization clause of [F4] inside the given ambient ZF universe. It proves that its definable constructible class satisfies every ZFC axiom. Step 2.1 already says that the ambient , viewed as an ordinal of , is inaccessible there; equivalently [F5] verifies inside that it is uncountable, regular and a strong limit. Hence "there is an inaccessible cardinal".
The steps above give the semantic conclusion that the ambient is inaccessible in the definable inner model . The formal-inner-model supplier [F4] expressly supplies no arithmetized consistency transfer, so this proof stops at that exact conclusion.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hiromi Ishii, Regularity Properties and Inaccessible Cardinals (standard reference, not scraped)