Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Asymptotic linearity implies asymptotic normality

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let X1,X2,… be iid with law P, let k<∞, and let ψ^n estimate ψ(P)∈Rk. If it is asymptotically linear at P with influence function φ∈L02(P)k, then

n{ψ^n−ψ(P)}⇒Nk(0,Σφ),Σφ=P[φφT].

The covariance may be singular. This is a distributional limit only; the theorem asserts neither local regularity nor estimator attainment of an efficiency bound.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The iid experiment, the finite-dimensional estimator and target, asymptotic linearity with φ∈L02(P)k, and AC.

[F1]

Asymptotically linear estimators and influence functions: ψ^n−ψ(P)=(Pn−P)φ+oP(n−1/2), where Pφ=0 and P∥φ∥2<∞.

[F2]

Multivariate iid central limit theorem: under AC, normalized sums of iid finite-second-moment vectors converge to the centered multivariate normal with their covariance, including singular covariance.

[F3]

Continuous mapping theorem: continuous linear maps preserve convergence in distribution.

[F4]

Slutsky's theorem for real random variables: adding a real random variable converging to zero in probability preserves a real distributional limit.

[F5]

Cramer wold device: convergence of every one-dimensional projection to the corresponding projection of a specified Borel probability law implies vector convergence in distribution; this use assumes AC.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: AC is assumed by [F2] and [F5].

Proof

Given: AC, iid Xi∼P, k<∞, and an estimator satisfying [F1].

1.1A1F1F2givenalgebra

Put Zn=n−1/2∑i=1nφ(Xi) and Rn=n{ψ^n−ψ(P)}−Zn. By [F1], Rn→0 in probability. The vectors φ(Xi) are iid, centered, and have finite second moment, so [F2] gives Zn⇒Z∼Nk(0,Σφ). The covariance is positive semidefinite by aTΣφa=P[(aTφ)2]≥0 for every a∈Rk.

2.1F3F4step 1.1given

Fix any a∈Rk. By [F3], aTZn⇒aTZ. Also ∣aTRn∣≤∥a∥∥Rn∥, so aTRn→0 in probability. Apply [F4] to obtain aT(Zn+Rn)⇒aTZ.

3.1A1F5step 1.1step 2.1∎

Step 2.1 holds for every a, and Z is the specified Borel Gaussian law from step 1.1. [F5] therefore gives Zn+Rn⇒Z, which is the asserted limit. No nonsingularity of Σφ is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources