How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Asymptotic linearity implies asymptotic normality
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be iid with law , let , and let estimate . If it is asymptotically linear at with influence function , then
The covariance may be singular. This is a distributional limit only; the theorem asserts neither local regularity nor estimator attainment of an efficiency bound.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The iid experiment, the finite-dimensional estimator and target, asymptotic linearity with , and AC.
Asymptotically linear estimators and influence functions: , where and .
Multivariate iid central limit theorem: under AC, normalized sums of iid finite-second-moment vectors converge to the centered multivariate normal with their covariance, including singular covariance.
Continuous mapping theorem: continuous linear maps preserve convergence in distribution.
Slutsky's theorem for real random variables: adding a real random variable converging to zero in probability preserves a real distributional limit.
Cramer wold device: convergence of every one-dimensional projection to the corresponding projection of a specified Borel probability law implies vector convergence in distribution; this use assumes AC.
The Axiom of Choice: AC is assumed by [F2] and [F5].
Proof
Given: AC, iid , , and an estimator satisfying [F1].
Put and . By [F1], in probability. The vectors are iid, centered, and have finite second moment, so [F2] gives . The covariance is positive semidefinite by for every .
Fix any . By [F3], . Also , so in probability. Apply [F4] to obtain .
Step 2.1 holds for every , and is the specified Borel Gaussian law from step 1.1. [F5] therefore gives , which is the asserted limit. No nonsingularity of is used.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. W. van der Vaart, Semiparametric Statistics, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1781, Lecture 2, §2.9 (Springer, 2002) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Edward H. Kennedy, Semiparametric theory, §§3–4 (2017) (standard reference, not scraped)