Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

CH yields a normal nonmetrizable Moore space

Statement

ZFC+CH proves that a normal nonmetrizable Moore space exists. By Metrizable spaces are collectionwise normal such a space is the CH instance of the failure of the normal Moore space conjecture.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The continuum hypothesis CH (The continuum hypothesis, and what this page does not prove): every uncountable set of reals is equinumerous with R; equivalently here 20=1, i.e. 2ω=ω1 in the von Neumann ordinals (Cardinal (initial ordinal) and cardinality, The natural numbers N (von Neumann)).

[F1]

ω=0 is the least infinite cardinal and ω1=ω+ is the least uncountable cardinal; a countable ordinal is one below ω1, and the nonzero limit ordinals below ω1 are exactly the countable ordinals of cofinality ω (The natural numbers N (von Neumann), Cardinal (initial ordinal) and cardinality).

[F2]

Clubs and stationarity in ω1: the set of nonzero limit ordinals below ω1 contains the club of all limit ordinals and is therefore stationary (Closed unbounded subsets of ordinals, Basic stationary-set calculus).

[F3]

Fleissner's construction (Fleissner's construction of a normal nonmetrizable Moore space from level data): if κ is an infinite cardinal, (κn)nω is an increasing sequence of cardinals with supnκn=κ and 2κn<κ for every n, 2κ=κ+, E{δ<κ+:cf(δ)=ω} is stationary, and some fixed ladders admit the separation functions mβ for every β<κ+, then a normal nonmetrizable Moore space exists (Fleissner's HYP covering interface, Moore spaces and developments).

[F4]

In ZFC, for every at-most-countable set A there is an index set IA which is either a finite initial segment of ω or all of ω, and a bijection IAA; choice permits these bijections to be fixed simultaneously for all β<ω1 (The Axiom of Choice, A function is a relation f with (a,b)f and (a,c)f implying b=c; f:AB, the value f(a), domain and codomain).

Proof

technique · direct; instantiate the construction of [F3]
1.1

Work in ZFC+CH and put κ:=ω, κn:=n for nω, and E:={δ<ω1:δ is a nonzero limit ordinal}. Then E{δ<ω1:cf(δ)=ω} by [F1], and E is stationary in ω1 by [F2].

givenF1F2
2.1

The parameters of step 1.1 satisfy the numerical hypotheses of [F3]: supnκn=supnn=ω=κ; for every n the ordinal 2n is a finite ordinal, hence 2n<ω=κ; and 2κ=2ω=ω1=κ+ is CH.

step 1.1givenF3
2.2

Fix, for each δE, an increasing sequence (δi)iω of nonlimit ordinals cofinal in δ; such a sequence exists because δ has cofinality ω, and all the sequences are chosen simultaneously by choice.

step 1.1F4
3.1

For every β<ω1 there is a function mβ:Eβω with δiηi whenever δη are in Eβ and imax(mβ(δ),mβ(η)). Indeed Eββ is at most countable, so by [F4] fix a bijection kδk from an index set I, where I is either a finite initial segment of ω or all of ω, onto Eβ. For k<n in I the set F(k,n):={iω:(δk)i=(δn)i} is finite, because if the two increasing ladders agreed at infinitely many levels then those common values would be cofinal in both δk and δn, forcing δk=δn. Recursively for nI, define m(n):=1+max({0}{m(k):k<n}k<nF(k,n)). The set maximized over is finite (also when I is finite or empty), so the recursion is well defined. If k<n are in I, then m(n)>m(k) and every iF(k,n) satisfies i<m(n); hence no coincidence level of the pair reaches max(m(k),m(n))=m(n). Thus mβ(δk):=m(k) is well defined by injectivity of the enumeration and has the required separation property.

step 2.2F1F4
4.1

Steps 2.1, 2.2 and 3.1 put exactly the hypotheses of [F3] at κ=ω, and (κ0=0 already) applying it yields a normal nonmetrizable Moore space.

step 2.1step 3.1F3

Remarks

  • The CH instance satisfies the local HYP interface. For every β<ω1 one has cf(β)ω, so the interface's clause (3b), which concerns only cf(β)>ω, is vacuous. At β=ω2, the two disjoint sets {ωn:1n<ω} and {ωn+1:n<ω} are both clubs; thus Eω2 contains a club but is nevertheless nonstationary. Step 3.1 independently proves the countable ladder separation that the construction consumes, as in the source's parenthetical countable-case argument.

  • Where CH is used. Only in 2ω=ω1 (step 2.1). The stationarity of E and the countable ladder separation are theorems of ZFC.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

67 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources