How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Moore spaces and developments
Definition
Let be a topological space (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison).
Stars. For a family of subsets of and a set put the star of with respect to (Refinements, locally finite families, point-finite families, and star refinements); write for . If covers then , and is exactly the union of the members of containing ; it is open as soon as the members of are open.
Development. A development for is a sequence of open covers of such that for every and every open with there is with Equivalently: the family is a neighbourhood base at (Neighbourhood of a point and neighbourhood base, with this library's convention that a neighbourhood need not be open). A development is decreasing when refines for every (Refinements, locally finite families, point-finite families, and star refinements).
is developable when it admits a development, and a Moore space is a regular space (Regular spaces and spaces, with the source disagreement over whether regularity includes stated explicitly) that is developable.
Every development can be made decreasing, and then it still is one. Let be a development and let be the family of all intersections with for . Each is an open cover of ; a member of is contained in a member of whenever , so refines and in particular refines for . Given open, choose with ; then by the displayed inclusion. So is a decreasing development, and a space is developable if and only if it has a decreasing development.
Developments give first countability. If is a development, then for each the sets are open neighbourhoods of , and every open set containing contains one of them; hence is a countable local base at and is first countable (First countable space: a countable neighbourhood base at every point). In particular every Moore space is first countable.
Remarks
-
Conventions. Regular and normal name separation conditions alone in this library, with written separately; Moore space is defined as regular plus developable.
-
Why a development and not a metric. Both structures define the topology by countably many "approximations"; a development survives in spaces that carry no compatible metric, and the whole point of this page is that a later ZFC theorem Collectionwise normal Moore spaces are metrizable concerns collectionwise normal Moore spaces, including the regular hypotheses. It does not assert metrization of arbitrary developable spaces. That later theorem is separate from the ZF definitions and finite normalization argument here.
-
The normalization uses no choice. The family is described by a formula from the given , and per point one selects one member of each of finitely many covers, which is finite choice and hence available in .
Depends on
- Regular spaces and $T_3$ spaces, with the source disagreement over whether regularity includes $T_1$ stated explicitly
- Refinements, locally finite families, point-finite families, and star refinements
- First countable space: a countable neighbourhood base at every point
- Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison
- Neighbourhood of a point and neighbourhood base, with this library's convention that a neighbourhood need not be open
Used by
- V=L refutes the normal Moore space conjecture Corollary
- Fleissner's HYP covering interface Definition
- Q-sets and Bing's tangent-disk Moore-space interface Definition
- Development stars form a countable local base Example
- False: ZFC proves the normal Moore space conjecture False statement
- A sigma-cellular base metrizes a normal Moore space Lemma
- Collectionwise normal Moore spaces are screenable Lemma
- Bing's Q-set space is a normal nonmetrizable Moore space Theorem
- CH yields a normal nonmetrizable Moore space Theorem
- Collectionwise normal Moore spaces are metrizable Theorem
- Fleissner's construction of a normal nonmetrizable Moore space from level data Theorem
- HYP produces a normal nonmetrizable Moore space Theorem
- MA plus not-CH yields a normal nonmetrizable Moore space Theorem
- Moore spaces are subparacompact Theorem
- NMSC gives an inner model with a measurable cardinal Theorem
- Normal screenable Moore spaces are metrizable Theorem
- PMEA implies the normal Moore space conjecture Theorem
- The consistency-strength sandwich for NMSC Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Dennis K. Burke, The Normal Moore Space Problem (standard reference, not scraped)