How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
HYP produces a normal nonmetrizable Moore space
Statement
proves that there is a normal nonmetrizable Moore space (Fleissner's HYP covering interface, Fleissner's construction of a normal nonmetrizable Moore space from level data).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Witnesses for HYP and fixed ladders for (Fleissner's HYP covering interface).
HYP asserts that is an infinite cardinal, that is an increasing sequence of cardinals, and the conjunction of clauses (1a), (1b), (2), (3a), (3b): ; for every ; ; is stationary in ; and is not stationary in for every with (Fleissner's HYP covering interface, Cardinal (initial ordinal) and cardinality).
Lemma 1 from the same hypotheses: for every there is such that for all distinct and all (Ladder separation from HYP).
The construction of Fleissner's construction of a normal nonmetrizable Moore space from level data converts exactly the data of [F1] together with [F2] into a normal nonmetrizable Moore space (Moore spaces and developments, Metrizable spaces are collectionwise normal).
Proof
Assume HYP. Then is infinite, is increasing, and clauses (1a), (1b), (2), (3a) of [F1] hold for the given , , and .
The separation conclusion of [F2] holds for the fixed ladders. Its proof uses clause (3b) at limit ordinals of uncountable cofinality and uses clause (3a) to obtain an automatic successor club at countable-cofinality stages.
Steps 1.1 and 2.1 put all hypotheses of the construction of [F3] at the given parameters, so there is a normal nonmetrizable Moore space.
Remarks
- HYP is used only through [F2]. The source says so explicitly ("we will not use (3b) directly, but rather the following consequence"), and the construction of [F3] is stated with the separation conclusion as an hypothesis, so the formal dependency is exact.
- The case is covered by the same item. When HYP holds with the clause (1b) is literal cardinal arithmetic on finite ordinals and the separation conclusion is supplied by Ladder separation from HYP like every other instance; the CH case with nonreflecting failure is treated separately in CH yields a normal nonmetrizable Moore space.
Depends on
- Fleissner's HYP covering interface
- Ladder separation from HYP
- Fleissner's construction of a normal nonmetrizable Moore space from level data
- Moore spaces and developments
- Normalized families and collectionwise normality
- Metrizable spaces are collectionwise normal
- Cardinal (initial ordinal) and cardinality
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- William G. Fleissner, If all normal Moore spaces are metrizable, then there is an inner model with a measurable cardinal (standard reference, not scraped)