Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

HYP produces a normal nonmetrizable Moore space

Statement

ZFC+HYP proves that there is a normal nonmetrizable Moore space (Fleissner's HYP covering interface, Fleissner's construction of a normal nonmetrizable Moore space from level data).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Witnesses κ,(κn)nω,E for HYP and fixed ladders (δi)iω for δE (Fleissner's HYP covering interface).

[F1]

HYP asserts that κ is an infinite cardinal, that (κn)nω is an increasing sequence of cardinals, and the conjunction of clauses (1a), (1b), (2), (3a), (3b): supnκn=κ; 2κn<κ for every n; 2κ=κ+; E{δ<κ+:cf(δ)=ω} is stationary in κ+; and Eβ is not stationary in β for every β<κ+ with cf(β)>ω (Fleissner's HYP covering interface, Cardinal (initial ordinal) and cardinality).

[F2]

Lemma 1 from the same hypotheses: for every β<κ+ there is mβ:Eβω such that δiηi for all distinct δ,ηEβ and all imax(mβ(δ),mβ(η)) (Ladder separation from HYP).

[F3]

The construction of Fleissner's construction of a normal nonmetrizable Moore space from level data converts exactly the data of [F1] together with [F2] into a normal nonmetrizable Moore space (Moore spaces and developments, Metrizable spaces are collectionwise normal).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Assume HYP. Then κ is infinite, (κn) is increasing, and clauses (1a), (1b), (2), (3a) of [F1] hold for the given κ, (κn), and E.

givenF1
2.1

The separation conclusion of [F2] holds for the fixed ladders. Its proof uses clause (3b) at limit ordinals of uncountable cofinality and uses clause (3a) to obtain an automatic successor club at countable-cofinality stages.

step 1.1F1F2
3.1

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 put all hypotheses of the construction of [F3] at the given parameters, so there is a normal nonmetrizable Moore space.

step 1.1step 2.1F3

Remarks

  • HYP is used only through [F2]. The source says so explicitly ("we will not use (3b) directly, but rather the following consequence"), and the construction of [F3] is stated with the separation conclusion as an hypothesis, so the formal dependency is exact.
  • The case κ=ω is covered by the same item. When HYP holds with κ=ω the clause (1b) is literal cardinal arithmetic on finite ordinals and the separation conclusion is supplied by Ladder separation from HYP like every other instance; the CH case with nonreflecting failure is treated separately in CH yields a normal nonmetrizable Moore space.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources