How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A sigma-cellular base metrizes a normal Moore space
Statement
Assume . Let be a normal Moore space carrying a base of the form (Basis and subbasis for a topology, and the topology generated by a family of sets) in which every is a pairwise disjoint family of open sets. Then is metrizable.
The normality and development hypotheses are essential to this conclusion: a space with a sigma-disjoint base need not be metrizable.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A normal Moore space , a development , and a base whose levels are pairwise disjoint open families.
A Moore space is regular and and has a development: every covers , and for every open some satisfies (Moore spaces and developments).
For every open , some member of the displayed base contains and is contained in (Basis and subbasis for a topology, and the topology generated by a family of sets).
If is closed, is open, , and is normal, then there is open with (A space is normal if and only if every closed inside an open admits an open with , Normal spaces and spaces, with the source disagreement over whether normality includes stated explicitly).
A family is discrete when every point has a neighbourhood meeting at most one member; a sigma-discrete open basis of a regular space yields a compatible metric in (Discrete families and -locally-finite and -discrete bases, Under choice, a space is metrizable if and only if it is regular, , and has a -discrete basis, The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
For , put , , and . The set is closed and is closed. Also : a member of the cover containing a point of is disjoint from .
Every point of belongs to some . Indeed, if , choose with by [F1]. Every member of containing is then disjoint from , which is precisely . Empty levels cause no exception: then .
Apply [F3] to the closed set inside the open set and obtain open with .
The family is a discrete family of open sets. A point outside has an open neighbourhood missing every member. A point of lies in by step 2.2 and hence in a unique ; the open neighbourhood meets no with .
The countable union is an open sigma-discrete basis. To verify the basis property, let be open and . By [F2] choose and with . Step 2.1 gives with , so and this set belongs to .
By [F1], is regular and . The sigma-discrete basis of step 4.1 therefore satisfies the reverse direction of Bing's metrization theorem [F4], so admits a compatible metric.
Remarks
-
Why the naive block metric fails. Although is open, its complement need not be open. Thus need not be an open partition, and agreement on those blocks does not directly define the original topology. Normality and the development are exactly what replace each cellular level by the countable family of discrete open families in step 3.1.
-
Source route. Step 3.1 is Bing's normal-development conversion from screenable to strongly screenable (Theorem 8). Step 5.1 uses the sigma-discrete-basis form of his metrization theorem (Theorem 3).
Depends on
- Moore spaces and developments
- Normal spaces and $T_4$ spaces, with the source disagreement over whether normality includes $T_1$ stated explicitly
- Discrete families and $\sigma$-locally-finite and $\sigma$-discrete bases
- Basis and subbasis for a topology, and the topology generated by a family of sets
- A space is normal if and only if every closed $A$ inside an open $U$ admits an open $V$ with $A \subseteq V \subseteq \overline{V} \subseteq U$
- Under choice, a space is metrizable if and only if it is regular, $T_1$, and has a $\sigma$-discrete basis
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- R. H. Bing, Metrization of topological spaces (standard reference, not scraped)