Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 2 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Under choice, every metric space has a σ-discrete basis and Under choice, a regular T₁ space with a σ-locally-finite basis has a compatible normal sequence. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

A sigma-cellular base metrizes a normal Moore space

Statement

Assume ZFC. Let X be a normal Moore space carrying a base of the form nNBn (Basis and subbasis for a topology, and the topology generated by a family of sets) in which every Bn is a pairwise disjoint family of open sets. Then X is metrizable.

The normality and development hypotheses are essential to this conclusion: a T1 space with a sigma-disjoint base need not be metrizable.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A normal Moore space X, a development (Gi)iN, and a base nBn whose levels are pairwise disjoint open families.

[F1]

A Moore space is regular and T1 and has a development: every Gi covers X, and for every open Ox some i satisfies St(x,Gi)O (Moore spaces and developments).

[F2]

For every open Ox, some member of the displayed base contains x and is contained in O (Basis and subbasis for a topology, and the topology generated by a family of sets).

[F4]

A family is discrete when every point has a neighbourhood meeting at most one member; a sigma-discrete open basis of a regular T1 space yields a compatible metric in ZFC (Discrete families and σ-locally-finite and σ-discrete bases, Under choice, a space is metrizable if and only if it is regular, T1, and has a σ-discrete basis, The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For n,iN, put Bn=Bn, Wn=XBn, and Xn,i=X{GGi:GWn}. The set Wn is closed and Xn,i is closed. Also Xn,iBn: a member of the cover Gi containing a point of Xn,i is disjoint from Wn.

givenF1
2.1

Every point of Bn belongs to some Xn,i. Indeed, if xBBn, choose i with St(x,Gi)B by [F1]. Every member of Gi containing x is then disjoint from Wn, which is precisely xXn,i. Empty levels cause no exception: then Bn=Xn,i=.

F1step 1.1
2.2

Apply [F3] to the closed set Xn,i inside the open set Bn and obtain open Dn,i with Xn,iDn,iDn,iBn.

F3step 1.1
3.1

The family Hn,i={Dn,iB:BBn} is a discrete family of open sets. A point outside Dn,i has an open neighbourhood missing every member. A point of Dn,i lies in Bn by step 2.2 and hence in a unique B0Bn; the open neighbourhood B0 meets no Dn,iB with BB0.

givenF4step 2.2
4.1

The countable union n,iHn,i is an open sigma-discrete basis. To verify the basis property, let O be open and xO. By [F2] choose n and BBn with xBO. Step 2.1 gives i with xXn,iDn,i, so xDn,iBO and this set belongs to Hn,i.

F2F4step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1
5.1

By [F1], X is regular and T1. The sigma-discrete basis of step 4.1 therefore satisfies the reverse direction of Bing's metrization theorem [F4], so X admits a compatible metric.

F1F4step 4.1

Remarks

  • Why the naive block metric fails. Although Bn is open, its complement Wn need not be open. Thus Bn{Wn} need not be an open partition, and agreement on those blocks does not directly define the original topology. Normality and the development are exactly what replace each cellular level by the countable family of discrete open families in step 3.1.

  • Source route. Step 3.1 is Bing's normal-development conversion from screenable to strongly screenable (Theorem 8). Step 5.1 uses the sigma-discrete-basis form of his metrization theorem (Theorem 3).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources