Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-09-09 (gpt-6-astra)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Radon-Nikodym derivatives satisfy the chain rule along nu << mu << lambda

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let λ and μ be sigma-finite positive measures and let ν be a signed measure or a finite complex measure on the same measurable space. Assume there is an increasing measurable exhaustion (Xn)n∈N with ⋃nXn=X, λ(Xn)<+∞, μ(Xn)<+∞, and ∣ν∣(Xn)<+∞ for every n, and assume ν≪μ≪λ. Then dνdλ=dνdμdμdλλ-almost everywhere.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and measures λ,μ,ν with the common finite-exhaustion hypothesis and ν≪μ≪λ.

[L2]

Nonnegative density substitution gives ∫q d(k dλ)=∫qk dλ. (Integrating against a density agrees with integrating the product)

[L3]

Real integrals are differences of positive and negative integrals when at least one is finite; complex L1 integration uses real and imaginary parts. (Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals)

[L4]

A nonnegative function has zero integral exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere; null-set integrals vanish. (A nonnegative measurable function has integral 0 exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere, A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes)

[L5]

Absolute continuity means vanishing on all measurable null sets and is transitive. (Absolute continuity of a signed or complex measure with respect to a positive measure)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L4givenchoose

Apply [L1] under AC to choose finite-valued k representing dμ/dλ. It may be made nonnegative everywhere: on En,m=Xn∩{k≤−1/m}, finite-piece integrability gives 0≤μ(En,m)=∫En,mk dλ≤−λ(En,m)/m, so each set is null. Their countable union is {k<0}. Replacing k there by zero leaves its integrals unchanged by [L4]. Thus μ=k dλ with finite nonnegative k.

2.1L1L2L3L5step 1.1algebra

If ν is signed, [L1] gives a finite real density h for ν with respect to μ. Its integral on X is defined, so at least one of ∫h+ dμ and ∫h− dμ is finite. Since (hk)±=h±k, [L2] gives ∫E(hk)± dλ=∫Eh± dμ for every measurable E. The same finite-sign bound permits subtraction, proving ∫Ehk dλ=ν(E). By [L5], ν≪λ and the given exhaustion permits [L1] for this pair. Its uniqueness clause identifies hk=dν/dλ almost everywhere.

2.2L1L2L3L5step 1.1algebra

If ν is finite complex, [L1] gives h=u+iv∈L1(μ). By [L2], ∫∣hk∣ dλ=∫∣h∣ dμ<∞. Apply [L2] to the four nonnegative parts of u,v and combine their finite integrals by [L3]; this yields ∫Ehk dλ=ν(E) for every E. Transitivity [L5] and the complex uniqueness clause [L1] again give hk=dν/dλ almost everywhere.

3.1L4step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2algebra∎

The product is independent of finite-valued representatives. If h′ agrees with h outside a measurable μ-null set Z, then ∫Zk dλ=μ(Z)=0, so [L4] gives k=0 λ-almost everywhere on Z. Hence h′k=hk λ-almost everywhere. Changing k on a λ-null set also leaves the product class unchanged. Thus the preceding identities give the stated identity of RN classes in both cases.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources