Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Chapman-Kolmogorov equations

Statement

For m,n0, Km+n=KmKn. Assume Choice and let X be a Markov chain with kernel K relative to (Fn). For every bounded measurable real f, E[f(Xm+n)Fm]=Knf(Xm)a.s. Equivalently, for AE, P(Xm+nAFm)=Kn(Xm,A)a.s. Both assertions include m=0 and n=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A probability kernel K; for the probabilistic claims, Choice and a K-chain X.

[F1]

Kernel iterates start from the identity kernel and use chronological composition. (Iterated transition kernels)

[F2]

Kernel composition is associative and preserves probability kernels. (Kernel composition is well defined and associative)

[F3]

The one-step Markov property holds for every bounded measurable test function. (Bounded-function form of the Markov property)

[F4]

Conditional expectation satisfies the tower property through nested sigma-algebras. (Tower property of conditional expectation)

Proof

1.1

The identity kernel is a two-sided identity: directly from its Dirac [F1, F2] sections, (IK)(x,A)=K(x,A) and (KI)(x,A)=1A(y)K(x,dy)=K(x,A). Thus Km+0=Km=KmK0, including m=0. If Km+n=KmKn, then [F1]--[F2] give Km+n+1=Km+nK=(KmKn)K=Km(KnK)=KmKn+1. Induction proves the kernel identity for all m,n0.

F1F2
2.1

Fix m and bounded measurable f. For n=0, f(Xm) is [F1, F3, F4, step 1.1] Fm-measurable and hence is its own conditional expectation; it is also K0f(Xm). Suppose the formula holds at n. By [F3] at time m+n, [F4], and the induction hypothesis applied to the bounded measurable function Kf, E[f(Xm+n+1)Fm]=E[E(f(Xm+n+1)Fm+n)Fm]=E[Kf(Xm+n)Fm]=Kn(Kf)(Xm)=Kn+1f(Xm). The last equality is the definition of kernel composition from step 1.1. Induction proves the conditional-expectation formula. Choice is used only by [F3]--[F4], which operate on conditional-expectation classes.

F1F3F4step 1.1
3.1

Taking f=1A in step 2.1 gives the displayed conditional-probability [F3, step 2.1] formula; conversely that formula for all A gives the bounded-function formula by the preceding lemma. Empty and full A yield respectively zero and one on both sides.

F3step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources