How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Chapman-Kolmogorov equations
Statement
For , Assume Choice and let be a Markov chain with kernel relative to . For every bounded measurable real , Equivalently, for , Both assertions include and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A probability kernel ; for the probabilistic claims, Choice and a -chain .
Kernel iterates start from the identity kernel and use chronological composition. (Iterated transition kernels)
Kernel composition is associative and preserves probability kernels. (Kernel composition is well defined and associative)
The one-step Markov property holds for every bounded measurable test function. (Bounded-function form of the Markov property)
Conditional expectation satisfies the tower property through nested sigma-algebras. (Tower property of conditional expectation)
Proof
The identity kernel is a two-sided identity: directly from its Dirac [F1, F2] sections, and . Thus , including . If , then [F1]--[F2] give Induction proves the kernel identity for all .
Fix and bounded measurable . For , is [F1, F3, F4, step 1.1] -measurable and hence is its own conditional expectation; it is also . Suppose the formula holds at . By [F3] at time , [F4], and the induction hypothesis applied to the bounded measurable function , The last equality is the definition of kernel composition from step 1.1. Induction proves the conditional-expectation formula. Choice is used only by [F3]--[F4], which operate on conditional-expectation classes.
Taking in step 2.1 gives the displayed conditional-probability [F3, step 2.1] formula; conversely that formula for all gives the bounded-function formula by the preceding lemma. Empty and full yield respectively zero and one on both sides.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Levin, Peres, Wilmer, Markov Chains and Mixing Times (standard reference, not scraped)
- Varadhan, Probability Theory, Chapter 4 (standard reference, not scraped)