Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

CircuitSAT is NP-complete

Statement

CircuitSAT is NP-complete under polynomial-time many-one reductions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the gate-list encoding of CircuitSAT.

[L1]

Well-formed gate lists have a designated output, and malformed lists are rejected, by Circuit satisfiability.

[L2]

SAT is NP-complete, by SAT is NP-complete.

[L3]

A polynomial-time many-one reduction must preserve membership in both directions, by Polynomial-time many-one reductions.

[L4]

NP-completeness means membership in NP together with NP-hardness, by NP-hard and NP-complete languages.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

A verifier first rejects a malformed list. Otherwise it guesses one bit for every input gate, evaluates the gates in topological order, and accepts iff the designated output is 1. Its time is polynomial in the list length, so CircuitSATNP.

L1given
1.2

Given a Boolean formula φ, create one circuit input for each variable and one circuit gate for each connective, ordered from leaves toward the root; designate the root gate as output. This map is polynomial time and produces a circuit Cφ satisfying Cφ(a)=φ(a) for every assignment a. Therefore φSAT iff CφCircuitSAT, so [L2] and [L3] give NP-hardness.

L2L3givenconstruct
2.1

Combining membership from step 1.1 with hardness from step 1.2 proves NP-completeness by [L4].

L4step 1.1step 1.2

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources