Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Karp--Lipton collapse

Statement

If NP⊆P/poly, then the polynomial hierarchy collapses to its second level: PH=Σ2p. Here Σ2p consists of languages expressible as x∈L  ⟺  ∃u ∀v R(x,u,v) for a polynomial-time predicate R and polynomially bounded strings; Π2p reverses the two quantifiers, and PH is the union of the constant-alternation levels.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: NP⊆P/poly.

[L1]

P/poly permits one polynomial-size circuit independently at each input length, by Circuit families and P/poly.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1givenconstruct

Let R(x,y,z) be any polynomial-time predicate with polynomially bounded z, and form the NP language ER={⟨x,y,w⟩:some extension z⪰w satisfies R(x,y,z)}. By the hypothesis, ER has polynomial-size decision circuits. Successively querying whether the current prefix has a satisfying extension, first with a 0 appended and then with a 1 appended, composes polynomially many copies of these decision circuits into a polynomial-size search circuit. On input (x,y) for which some witness exists, it outputs an actual z satisfying R(x,y,z).

2.1L1step 1.1

Let L∈Π2p, so x∈L  ⟺  ∀y ∃z R(x,y,z). For each fixed input length, step 1.1 supplies a single polynomial-size search circuit C which works for every pair (x,y) of the relevant padded lengths. Therefore x∈L  ⟺  ∃C ∀y  R(x,y,C(x,y)). If x∈L, choose the search circuit from step 1.1; conversely, any circuit satisfying the right side supplies the required witness for every y. The predicate merely evaluates C and checks R, so it is polynomial-time and the right side is a Σ2p formula.

3.1step 2.1∎

Thus Π2p⊆Σ2p; the reverse containment after complementing gives equality of the second levels. Replacing each inner Π2p block of a higher alternating formula by its Σ2p form and merging adjacent existential and universal blocks inductively collapses every constant-alternation level to Σ2p. Consequently PH=Σ2p.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources