Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A compact compact-open family is equicontinuous on a locally compact Hausdorff domain

Statement

Let X be a locally compact Hausdorff space, let Y be a metric space, and let K⊆C(X,Y) be compact in the compact-open topology. Then K is equicontinuous.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A locally compact Hausdorff space X, a metric space Y, and a compact compact-open family K.

[L1]

Evaluation C(X,Y)×X→Y is continuous for a locally compact Hausdorff domain (Evaluation is continuous for the compact-open topology on a locally compact Hausdorff domain).

[L3]

Equicontinuity requires one domain neighbourhood for every member of the family at the chosen point and tolerance (Equicontinuity on a topological domain and pointwise relative compactness).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L3

If X=∅ or K=∅, the conclusion is vacuous. Otherwise fix x∈X and ε>0.

1.2L1

Call a pair (O,U) of open sets admissible at f∈K when f∈O, x∈U, and d(g(y),f(x))<ε/3 for every g∈O and every y∈U. Continuity of evaluation at (f,x), which [L1] supplies, makes at least one pair admissible at each f∈K. Let A be the set of all triples (f,O,U) with (O,U) admissible at f. This set is defined outright and no pair is selected, so no choice principle is used.

2.1L2step 1.2

The open sets O occurring in triples of A cover K, because each f∈K lies in the O of some admissible triple. Applying [L2] to the cover indexed by A yields finitely many triples (f1,O1,U1),…,(fm,Om,Um) of A whose Oi already cover K; only this finite selection is made. Put U=U1∩⋯∩Um, an open neighbourhood of x as a finite intersection.

3.1L3step 1.2step 2.1∎

Let g∈K and take i≤m with g∈Oi. If y∈U then y∈Ui and x∈Ui, so admissibility at fi gives d(g(y),fi(x))<ε/3 and d(g(x),fi(x))<ε/3, whence d(g(y),g(x))<2ε/3<ε. The one neighbourhood U works for every g∈K, which is what [L3] requires for equicontinuity at x.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources