How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The continued-fraction algorithm for real numbers
Statement
Let be a real number. The complete-quotient algorithm of Complete quotients in the continued-fraction algorithm either terminates with a finite regular continued fraction equal to , or produces an infinite regular continued fraction whose convergents converge to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A real number , its complete quotients , its digits , and its convergents .
Whenever is defined, (Complete-quotient tail formula).
Consecutive convergents satisfy . (Determinant identity for consecutive convergents).
Every infinite regular continued fraction has a unique value, namely the common limit of its even and odd convergent subsequences. (Every infinite regular continued fraction converges to a unique real number).
Proof
If for some , then repeated substitution of the identities for yields. [given, algebra] For the last digit is positive because every complete quotient after the first is greater than , so the output is a finite regular continued fraction.
Suppose the algorithm never terminates. Then every is defined and satisfies , so [F1] and [F2] give. [F1, F2, algebra] Hence
The infinite digit sequence is therefore a regular continued fraction, so by [F3] its convergents converge to some real number . [F3, step 1.2, algebra] Step 1.2 shows , and therefore Thus .
Step 1.1 handles the terminating case and step 2.1 the nonterminating case, so the algorithm always reconstructs the original real number.
Depends on
Used by
- A negative irrational has a regular continued fraction with positive later digits Example
- The continued fraction [1; overline 2] for sqrt(2) Example
- Convergent error bound Lemma
- Lagrange's theorem for regular continued fractions Theorem
- The continued-fraction algorithm terminates exactly on rational numbers Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Hackman, Elementary Number Theory (standard reference, not scraped)
- William Stein, Elementary Number Theory: Primes, Congruences, and Secrets (standard reference, not scraped)