Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A convex real function is Lipschitz on every closed bounded subinterval of the interior of its domain, hence continuous throughout the interior

Statement

Let f:IRf:I\to\mathbb R be convex and let [a,b]intI[a,b]\subseteq\operatorname{int}I. Then there is M0M\ge0 such that f(y)f(x)Myx|f(y)-f(x)|\le M|y-x| for all x,y[a,b]x,y\in[a,b]. Thus ff is Lipschitz on [a,b][a,b] (Lipschitz map, α\alpha-Hölder map for rational 0<α10 < \alpha \le 1, and contraction) and is continuous at every point of intI\operatorname{int}I (Continuity of f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} at a point of AA and on AA: the ε\varepsilon-δ\delta condition, its agreement with limxcf(x)=f(c)\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = f(c) at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A convex function f:IRf:I\to\mathbb R and [a,b]intI[a,b]\subseteq\operatorname{int}I.

[L1]

For a convex function and u<v<wu<v<w, the three secant slopes satisfy s(u,v)s(u,w)s(v,w)s(u,v)\le s(u,w)\le s(v,w) (For a convex function and x<y<zx<y<z, the three secant slopes satisfy s(x,y)s(x,z)s(y,z)s(x,y)\le s(x,z)\le s(y,z)).

[L2]

A function is Lipschitz with constant LL when d(f(x),f(y))Ld(x,y)d(f(x),f(y))\le Ld(x,y) for all points in its domain (Lipschitz map, α\alpha-Hölder map for rational 0<α10 < \alpha \le 1, and contraction).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Choose u,vIu,v\in I with u<ab<vu<a\le b<v; then for ax<yba\le x<y\le b, two applications of the three-slope inequality give s(u,a)s(x,y)s(b,v)s(u,a)\le s(x,y)\le s(b,v).

L1
2.1

With M:=max{s(u,a),s(b,v)}M:=\max\{|s(u,a)|,|s(b,v)|\}, step 1.1 yields f(y)f(x)Myx|f(y)-f(x)|\le M|y-x| for x<yx<y; symmetry gives the same estimate for all x,y[a,b]x,y\in[a,b], which is the Lipschitz condition.

step 1.1L2algebra
3.1

Given cintIc\in\operatorname{int}I, choose such an interval [a,b][a,b] containing cc in its interior; the estimate in step 2.1 gives the ε\varepsilon--δ\delta condition at cc by taking δ=ε/M\delta=\varepsilon/M when M>0M>0, and is immediate when M=0M=0.

step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 50 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources