Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + claude-opus-5[1m])audited 2026-08-24
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Assuming countable choice, countable covering costs define an outer measure

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let X be a set, let C⊆P(X) contain ∅ and X, and let p:C→[0,+∞] satisfy p(∅)=0. For E⊆X, define

μ∗(E):=inf⁡{∑k=0∞p(Ck):(Ck)k∈N is in C and E⊆⋃kCk}.

Then μ∗ is an outer measure on X. In short: assuming countable choice, the infimum of countable covering costs defines an outer measure.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The data in the Statement and the Axiom of Countable Choice.

[F1]

Countable choice says that for every family (Xn)n∈N of nonempty sets, there is a function f on N with f(n)∈Xn for every n. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[L1]

For every double sequence (aij)i,j∈N in [0,+∞], the two iterated nonnegative extended sums are equal, so the order of summation may be interchanged even when the common value is +∞. (Tonelli's theorem for double series of nonnegative extended real numbers)

[L2]

If A and B are at most countable, then A×B is at most countable, with an explicit enumeration and no choice principle. (A product of two at most countable sets is at most countable)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

The sequence consisting only of empty sets covers ∅ at cost 0, so μ∗(∅)=0; if E⊆F, every cover of F covers E, so taking infima gives μ∗(E)≤μ∗(F).

2.1step 1.1F1L1L2choosealgebra∎

Let (Ej) be a sequence. If some μ∗(Ej)=+∞, the desired subadditive inequality is automatic. Otherwise, for ε>0, [F1] selects for each j a cover (Cjk)k of Ej with cost below μ∗(Ej)+ε2−(j+1); [L2] enumerates the doubly indexed family as one sequence covering ⋃jEj, and [L1] computes its cost as at most ∑jμ∗(Ej)+ε, since the displayed geometric error series has partial sums ε(1−2−n). Letting ε decrease to 0 proves countable subadditivity, so with step 1.1 the function is an outer measure.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources