Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-21
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Tonelli's theorem for double series of nonnegative extended real numbers

Statement

For every double sequence (aij)i,j∈N in [0,+∞],

∑i=0∞(∑j=0∞aij)=sup⁡m,n∈N∑i<m∑j<naij=∑j=0∞(∑i=0∞aij),

where every sum is the nonnegative extended sum of Series in the nonnegative extended real line. Thus the order of summation may be interchanged, even when the common value is +∞.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A double sequence (aij)i,j∈N with 0≤aij≤+∞.

[L1]

For a nonnegative extended sequence, the partial sums start at the empty sum 0, increase, and the series is their supremum in [0,+∞] (Series in the nonnegative extended real line).

[L2]

Every subset of R‾ has a least upper bound and a greatest lower bound there, with sup⁡∅=−∞ and inf⁡∅=+∞ (Every subset of R‾ has a least upper bound and a greatest lower bound in R‾, agreeing with the real supremum and infimum on nonempty sets bounded in R).

[L3]

A natural-number-indexed finite family of nonempty sets has a choice function in ZF (Every natural-number-indexed list of nonempty sets has a choice function on its family of values).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1

Put ri,n:=∑j<naij and Rm,n:=∑i<mri,n. These finite sums exist for m,n∈N, R0,n=Rm,0=0, and Rm,n is nondecreasing in each index.

1.2L2

The set {Rm,n:m,n∈N} is nonempty and bounded above by +∞, so let S:=sup⁡m,nRm,n∈[0,+∞].

2.1step 1.1L1L2L3choose

For fixed m, sup⁡nRm,n=∑i<msup⁡nri,n: the inequality ≤ follows from ri,n≤sup⁡qri,q; for the reverse inequality, if one of the finitely many row suprema is +∞ then its partial sums make Rm,n unbounded, while if they are all finite, for every ε>0 finite choice selects for each i<m an index ni with ri,ni>sup⁡nri,n−ε/m when m>0; take the largest ni and use monotonicity. The case m=0 is the empty equality 0=0.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1L1L2

Repeating steps 1.1 and 2.1 with the two indices interchanged gives ∑j(∑iaij)=sup⁡nsup⁡mRm,n=S.

3.2step 1.2step 2.1L1

By [L1] and step 2.1, ∑i(∑jaij)=sup⁡m∑i<msup⁡nri,n=sup⁡msup⁡nRm,n=S.

4.1step 3.2step 3.1∎

Both iterated sums equal the supremum of the finite rectangular sums, so they equal one another; the argument includes zero rows, zero columns, infinite entries, and unbounded finite rectangles without subtraction or an undefined product.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources