Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

First-step equations for nonnegative exit costs

Statement

Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice). Let X be a Markov chain on an at most countable state space E with transition kernel K and transition matrix p(x,y)=K(x,{y}). Let D⊆E, put T=TDc, and let f:Dc→[0,∞) and c:D→[0,∞) be bounded. Define the boundary payoff B by B=f(XT) when T<∞ and B=0 when T=∞, so no value X∞ is used. For x∈E, let u(x):=Ex ⁣[B+∑0≤m<Tc(Xm)]∈[0,+∞], with the empty sum equal to 0. Then u(x)=f(x)(x∈Dc),u(x)=c(x)+Pu(x)(x∈D), where Pϕ(x)=∑y∈E:p(x,y)>0p(x,y)ϕ(y) is the support-restricted nonnegative kernel action of Nonnegative kernel action and finite drift. The equation on D is in extended nonnegative arithmetic and may have value +infty.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a countable-state Markov chain with kernel K, D⊆E, bounded nonnegative f and c, and T=TDc.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; it is assumed here for the canonical laws and conditional-expectation/Markov suppliers cited below. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F1]

TA=inf⁡{n≥0:Xn∈A}, so T=0 when the initial state is in Dc. (Hitting, return, and visit times)

[F17]

The infimum of the empty set is +∞. (Hitting, return, and visit times)

[F2]

p(x,y)=K(x,{y}) for the transition matrix. (Transition matrices and n-step probabilities)

[F18]

Pϕ(x)=∑y:p(x,y)>0p(x,y)ϕ(y) for nonnegative ϕ, with zero weights omitted. (Nonnegative kernel action and finite drift)

[F3]

For bounded product-measurable H, hH(x)=ExH(X0,X1,…) is measurable and E[H(Xn,Xn+1,…)∣Fn]=hH(Xn) almost surely. (Markov property for bounded future path functionals)

[F4]

For bounded measurable g, E[g(Xn+1)∣Fn]=Kg(Xn) almost surely, where Kg(x)=∫g(y)K(x,dy). (Bounded-function form of the Markov property)

[F5]

When the initial state is fixed at x, Px=Pδx and Ex=Eδx; hence X0=x almost surely under Px. (Initial distribution of a Markov chain)

[F6]

On a countable discrete space, a measure is the sum of its singleton weights; for K(x,⋅) they are p(x,y). (Every measure on a countable discrete space is its weighted sum of Dirac measures)

[F7]

Increasing sequences of nonnegative measurable functions pass to the limit under the nonnegative integral. (Monotone convergence for the integral)

[F8]

The nonnegative integral is additive, including when one or both integrals are infinite. (Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral)

[F9]

Restricting a nonnegative measurable function to a measurable event by setting it to zero off the event preserves measurability. (Closure properties of measurable functions used by the integral)

[F10]

A nonnegative extended series is the supremum of its increasing finite partial sums. (Series in the nonnegative extended real line)

[F11]

Pointwise increasing limits of measurable functions are measurable. (Closure properties of measurable functions used by the integral)

[F12]

Every nonnegative measurable function is the pointwise increasing limit of nonnegative simple functions. (Every nonnegative measurable function is the increasing limit of simple measurable functions)

[F13]

For a nonnegative simple s=∑i=1rai1Ai on disjoint measurable sets, its simple integral is ∑i=1raiμ(Ai). (The integral of a nonnegative simple function)

[F14]

For a nonnegative double sequence, the two iterated sums agree, including when their common value is +∞. (Tonelli's theorem for double series of nonnegative extended real numbers)

[F15]

For bounded real Y, E[E(Y∣G)]=E[Y]. (Basic algebra and order properties of conditional expectation)

[F16]

Sums of measurable extended-real functions are measurable whenever the sum is defined pointwise. (Closure properties of measurable functions used by the integral)

[F19]

For a nonnegative simple measurable function, its nonnegative Lebesgue integral equals its simple integral. (The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions)

[F20]

The nonnegative Lebesgue integral is the supremum of the simple integrals of all nonnegative simple minorants. (The nonnegative Lebesgue integral)

[F21]

A nonnegative simple measurable function has finite range. (Nonnegative simple measurable functions)

[F22]

For every A and n≥0, {TA≤n}=⋃j=0n{Xj∈A}, so the hitting events used here are measurable. (Hitting, return, and visit times)

Proof

technique · define the path reward before any random-time evaluation, then use bounded truncations and monotone convergence
1.1F1F9F10F16F17F22given

On EN0, put T(ω)=inf⁡{n≥0:ωn∈Dc}, extend f by zero on D and c by zero on Dc, and define B(ω)=∑n≥0f(ωn)1{T(ω)=n}, C(ω)=∑m≥0c(ωm)1{m<T(ω)}, and R=B+C. The hitting events are measurable by [F22], the restrictions by [F9], the nonnegative series by [F10], and their sum by [F16]; thus R is measurable, B=0 on T=∞ by [F17], and no coordinate at infinity is evaluated.

1.2F1F5given

If x∈Dc, then X0=x almost surely under Px by [F5], so T=0 by [F1], B=f(x) and C=0; hence u(x)=ExR=f(x). This includes an empty D and a start already on the boundary.

1.3F1F8F17given

If x∈D, then every path starting at x has T≥1; its shifted path exits at time T−1 when T<∞ and never exits when T=∞, so R(ω)=c(x)+R(ω1,ω2,…) in extended nonnegative arithmetic. Additivity [F8] gives u(x)=c(x)+ExR(X1,X2,…) without subtraction, also when the tail expectation is infinite.

1.4F3F15given

For N≥1, let HN=R∧N and hN(y)=EyHN(X0,X1,…); then hN is measurable and bounded by N by [F3], and its conditional future-path identity at time 1, followed by [F15], gives ExHN(X1,X2,…)=ExhN(X1).

1.5F4F5F15given

The bounded one-step identity [F4], expectation preservation [F15], and X0=x under Px [F5] give ExhN(X1)=KhN(x):=∫EhN(y)K(x,dy).

1.6F2F6F7F10F12F13F14F18F19F20F21given

For a nonnegative simple s=∑i=1rai1Ai with disjoint measurable Ai, [F19] identifies its nonnegative integral with its simple integral [F13], and countable singleton weights [F6] give ∫Es(y)K(x,dy)=∑iaiK(x,Ai)=∑iai∑y∈Aip(x,y)=∑y:p(x,y)>0p(x,y)s(y). For general nonnegative measurable g, choose simple sj↑g by [F12]; MCT [F7] passes the integrals to the limit, while [F20] fixes the nonnegative integral and [F21] ensures the increments si+1−si are finite-valued nonnegative simple functions. Thus sj=∑i<j(si+1−si) with s0=0; Tonelli [F14] interchanges the increment and state sums when E is countably infinite, using its fixed enumeration, while for finite E the limit passes through the finite sum. It follows that ∫Eg(y)K(x,dy)=∑y:p(x,y)>0p(x,y)g(y), the support-restricted action [F18].

2.1F2F7F11F18step 1.3step 1.4step 1.5step 1.6given

As N→∞, HN(X1,X2,…)↑R(X1,X2,…) and hN(y)↑u(y) for every y; [F7] and measurability of the increasing limit [F11] give ExR(X1,X2,…)=∫Eu(y)K(x,dy)=∑y:p(x,y)>0p(x,y)u(y)=Pu(x) by steps 1.4–1.6 and [F2]. Combining with step 1.3 proves u(x)=c(x)+Pu(x) on D, including the value +∞.

3.1A1F1F2F3F4F5F6F15F17F18step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1given∎

If E=∅, there is no probability law of an E-valued chain and no state to check; if D=∅, step 1.2 covers every state; if D=E, the boundary payoff is zero and the equation still holds when T=∞ and u=+∞. If f=c=0, then u=0; a one-state absorbing chain in D with positive cost has u=+∞=c+Pu, and deterministic rows obey the same shift calculation. The endpoint T=0 is handled in step 1.2, whereas on D one has T≥1 and the exit-time cost is excluded by m<T. AC [A1] is used for the canonical laws and conditional-expectation/Markov identities [F3]–[F5], [F15]; countability supplies the fixed row representation, with no additional choice principle. The two equations form no biconditional.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

56 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources