How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Return-cycle occupation measure and minimality
Statement
Assume AC, let be a transition matrix on a countable state space , and let be a -chain started at , with law . Let
and define the return-cycle occupation measure by
Then:
- and .
- for every , and .
- is pointwise minimal: if satisfies and for every , then for every .
- If is recurrent, then , that is, is invariant.
Neither the series defining , nor the sums in items 2–3, is asserted to be finite except where stated; all are nonnegative extended sums.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a countable transition matrix on , a -chain started at with law , and as in the statement.
Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; AC is used through the cited finite-dimensional-law supplier. (The Axiom of Choice)
is a stopping time with values in ; the value is never used, and the initial visit at time zero is not counted as a return. (Hitting, return, and visit times)
The transition entries are with , and every row of sums to one. (Transition matrices and n-step probabilities)
Under AC, the joint law of for a chain with initial law is given by the iterated kernel integrals, the integral reducing to evaluation; taking indicators gives the probability of every finite cylinder. (Finite-dimensional laws of a Markov chain)
For every double sequence , the two iterated sums and the supremum of finite partial sums coincide, possibly at . (Tonelli's theorem for double series of nonnegative extended real numbers)
If are measurable and pointwise, then . (Monotone convergence for the integral)
Proof
Given: AC, a countable transition matrix on , a -chain started at with law , and as in the statement.
[A1] Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; AC is used through the cited finite-dimensional-law supplier. (The Axiom of Choice)
[F1] is a stopping time with values in ; the value is never used, and the initial visit at time zero is not counted as a return. (Hitting, return, and visit times)
[F2] The transition entries are with , and every row of sums to one. (Transition matrices and n-step probabilities)
[F3] Under AC, the joint law of for a chain with initial law is given by the iterated kernel integrals, the integral reducing to evaluation; taking indicators gives the probability of every finite cylinder. (Finite-dimensional laws of a Markov chain)
[F4] For every double sequence , the two iterated sums and the supremum of finite partial sums coincide, possibly at . (Tonelli's theorem for double series of nonnegative extended real numbers)
[F5] If are measurable and pointwise, then . (Monotone convergence for the integral)
Proof technique: direct survival-prefix recursion, with nonnegative summation and a minimality iteration.
Define the survival masses for , . For , requires all to avoid , so and in particular . At the avoidance condition is empty, and [F3] with initial law gives almost surely, so and for .
For every we have : by the monotone convergence theorem [F5] applied to the partial sums of the nonnegative terms , the expectation of the series is the series of the expectations .
Put . A nonnegative satisfies and for all if and only if as extended nonnegative functions, because at the right side is and at it is .
If there is no starting state , so the hypotheses cannot be met.
If is absorbing, the finite-dimensional law [F3] and the initial law imply almost surely for every ; hence by [F1].
The absorbing path of step 1.5 has exactly one occupation before , at time , so , .
For every and the recursion holds. Since , the event equals . Partition the first event by : the cylinder formula [F3] gives for each , and countable additivity gives the displayed sum. At only contributes, with mass ; for , the term is zero by step 1.1.
by steps 1.1 and 1.2, since the series for has the single nonzero term .
: for every outcome the sum equals one exactly for the indices , so both sides equal the expectation of ; applying [F4] to the nonnegative double sequence interchanges the sums over and , [F5] identifies with by the indicator tail identity, and infinite values are allowed on both sides.
For every , using the survival-mass definition in step 1.1, the last-step factorization [F3] gives , since rules out an earlier return and makes the next time the first return.
Since is absorbing, ; with from step 2.1 and the matrix convention [F2], . Thus the absorbing case satisfies the occupation-mass, return-time, and return-flow identities.
Interchanging the nonnegative sums by [F4] and using step 1.2 gives , since the positive finite return times partition .
For , : by step 1.2, [F4] applied to the nonnegative terms , and step 2.2, the last step because for .
For such and every , , where are powers of the substochastic matrix . Induct on from step 1.3; each reassociation of the countable nonnegative matrix sums is justified by [F4]. By step 2.2 and the zero -coordinate in step 1.1, with , so the first sum is the th partial sum of the series in step 1.2.
The time- term contributes although no return has occurred, since the occupation sum starts at while the return time is strictly positive.
If is transient then by step 3.2, so item 4 genuinely uses recurrence; item 3's minimality inequality remains valid.
Letting in step 3.4 gives for every , since the remainder is nonnegative and a nonnegative series is the supremum of its partial sums; this is the asserted pointwise minimality.
If is recurrent then , so by steps 2.3 and 3.2, while step 3.3 gives equality at every ; hence .
AC [A1] is used through the finite-dimensional-law supplier [F3]; once that chain law is supplied, the recursion and nonnegative summations are finite-time or Tonelli/monotone-convergence calculations with no further choice. The pointwise minimality assertion is one-way, not an if-and-only-if.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, fifth edition, §5.5, expected occupation measure and its minimality (standard reference, not scraped)
- Aldous–Chewi, Probability Theory, Lectures 13–15 (standard reference, not scraped)