Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Return-cycle occupation measure and minimality

Statement

Assume AC, let p be a transition matrix on a countable state space E, and let X be a p-chain started at b∈E, with law Pb. Let

Tb+=inf⁡{n≥1:Xn=b}

and define the return-cycle occupation measure by

μb(y):=Eb∑0≤n<Tb+1{Xn=y},y∈E.

Then:

  1. μb(b)=1 and ∑y∈Eμb(y)=EbTb+.
  2. μb(y)=∑x∈Eμb(x) p(x,y) for every y≠b, and (μbp)(b)=Pb(Tb+<∞).
  3. μb is pointwise minimal: if ν:E→[0,+∞] satisfies ν(b)=1 and ν(y)=∑x∈Eν(x)p(x,y) for every y≠b, then μb(y)≤ν(y) for every y∈E.
  4. If b is recurrent, then μbp=μb, that is, μb is invariant.

Neither the series defining μb(y), nor the sums in items 2–3, is asserted to be finite except where stated; all are nonnegative extended sums.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a countable transition matrix p on E, a p-chain X started at b with law Pb, and Tb+ as in the statement.

[A1]

Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; AC is used through the cited finite-dimensional-law supplier. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F1]

Tx+=inf⁡{n≥1:Xn=x} is a stopping time with values in N∪{+∞}; the value X∞ is never used, and the initial visit at time zero is not counted as a return. (Hitting, return, and visit times)

[F2]

The transition entries are p(n)(x,y)=Kn(x,{y}) with p(0)(x,y)=1{x=y}, and every row of p sums to one. (Transition matrices and n-step probabilities)

[F3]

Under AC, the joint law of (Xn0,…,Xnr) for a chain with initial law μ is given by the iterated kernel integrals, the n0=0 integral reducing to evaluation; taking indicators gives the probability of every finite cylinder. (Finite-dimensional laws of a Markov chain)

[F4]

For every double sequence aij≥0, the two iterated sums and the supremum of finite partial sums coincide, possibly at +∞. (Tonelli's theorem for double series of nonnegative extended real numbers)

[F5]

If 0≤f1≤f2≤⋯ are measurable and fn↑f pointwise, then ∫fn dμ↑∫f dμ. (Monotone convergence for the integral)

Proof

Given: AC, a countable transition matrix p on E, a p-chain X started at b with law Pb, and Tb+ as in the statement.

[A1] Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; AC is used through the cited finite-dimensional-law supplier. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F1] Tx+=inf⁡{n≥1:Xn=x} is a stopping time with values in N∪{+∞}; the value X∞ is never used, and the initial visit at time zero is not counted as a return. (Hitting, return, and visit times)

[F2] The transition entries are p(n)(x,y)=Kn(x,{y}) with p(0)(x,y)=1{x=y}, and every row of p sums to one. (Transition matrices and n-step probabilities)

[F3] Under AC, the joint law of (Xn0,…,Xnr) for a chain with initial law μ is given by the iterated kernel integrals, the n0=0 integral reducing to evaluation; taking indicators gives the probability of every finite cylinder. (Finite-dimensional laws of a Markov chain)

[F4] For every double sequence aij≥0, the two iterated sums and the supremum of finite partial sums coincide, possibly at +∞. (Tonelli's theorem for double series of nonnegative extended real numbers)

[F5] If 0≤f1≤f2≤⋯ are measurable and fn↑f pointwise, then ∫fn dμ↑∫f dμ. (Monotone convergence for the integral)

Proof technique: direct survival-prefix recursion, with nonnegative summation and a minimality iteration.

1.1A1F1F3given

Define the survival masses αn(y):=Pb(Xn=y, Tb+>n) for n≥0, y∈E. For n≥1, Tb+>n requires X1,…,Xn all to avoid b, so αn(y)=Pb(X1≠b,…,Xn≠b, Xn=y) and in particular αn(b)=0. At n=0 the avoidance condition is empty, and [F3] with initial law δb gives X0=b almost surely, so α0(b)=1 and α0(y)=0 for y≠b.

1.2F5given

For every y we have μb(y)=∑n≥0αn(y): by the monotone convergence theorem [F5] applied to the partial sums of the nonnegative terms 1{Xn=y}1{n<Tb+}, the expectation of the series is the series of the expectations Pb(Xn=y, Tb+>n)=αn(y).

1.3F2given

Put Q(x,y):=p(x,y)1{y≠b}. A nonnegative ν satisfies ν(b)=1 and ν(y)=∑xν(x)p(x,y) for all y≠b if and only if ν=δb+νQ as extended nonnegative functions, because at y=b the right side is 1+0=ν(b) and at y≠b it is (νp)(y).

1.4given

If E=∅ there is no starting state b, so the hypotheses cannot be met.

1.5A1F1F3given

If b is absorbing, the finite-dimensional law [F3] and the initial law δb imply Xn=b almost surely for every n≥0; hence Tb+=1 by [F1].

2.1step 1.5given

The absorbing path of step 1.5 has exactly one occupation before Tb+, at time 0, so μb=δb, ∑yμb(y)=1=EbTb+.

2.2A1F2F3step 1.1given

For every n≥0 and y≠b the recursion αn+1(y)=∑x∈Eαn(x)p(x,y) holds. Since y≠b, the event {Tb+>n, Xn+1=y} equals {Tb+>n+1, Xn+1=y}. Partition the first event by Xn=x: the cylinder formula [F3] gives Pb(Tb+>n, Xn=x, Xn+1=y)=αn(x)p(x,y) for each x, and countable additivity gives the displayed sum. At n=0 only x=b contributes, with mass p(b,y); for n≥1, the x=b term is zero by step 1.1.

2.3step 1.1step 1.2

μb(b)=1 by steps 1.1 and 1.2, since the series for μb(b) has the single nonzero term α0(b)=1.

2.4F4F5step 1.2given

∑y∈Eμb(y)=EbTb+: for every outcome the sum ∑y∈E1{Xn=y} equals one exactly for the Tb+ indices n<Tb+, so both sides equal the expectation of ∑n≥01{n<Tb+}; applying [F4] to the nonnegative double sequence Pb(Xn=y, n<Tb+) interchanges the sums over y and n, [F5] identifies ∑nPb(Tb+>n) with EbTb+ by the indicator tail identity, and infinite values are allowed on both sides.

2.5A1F1F3step 1.1given

For every n≥0, using the survival-mass definition in step 1.1, the last-step factorization [F3] gives ∑x∈Eαn(x)p(x,b)=Pb(Xn+1=b, Tb+>n)=Pb(Tb+=n+1), since Tb+>n rules out an earlier return and Xn+1=b makes the next time the first return.

3.1F2step 2.1given

Since b is absorbing, p(b,b)=1; with μb=δb from step 2.1 and the matrix convention [F2], (μbp)(b)=1. Thus the absorbing case satisfies the occupation-mass, return-time, and return-flow identities.

3.2F4step 1.2step 2.5given

Interchanging the nonnegative sums by [F4] and using step 1.2 gives (μbp)(b)=∑x∈Eμb(x)p(x,b)=∑n≥0Pb(Tb+=n+1)=Pb(Tb+<∞), since the positive finite return times partition {Tb+<∞}.

3.3F4step 2.2step 1.2given

For y≠b, μb(y)=∑x∈Eμb(x)p(x,y): by step 1.2, [F4] applied to the nonnegative terms αn(x)p(x,y), and step 2.2, ∑x∈Eμb(x)p(x,y)=∑n≥0∑x∈Eαn(x)p(x,y)=∑n≥0αn+1(y)=μb(y)−α0(y)=μb(y), the last step because α0(y)=0 for y≠b.

3.4F4step 1.1step 2.2step 1.2step 1.3given

For such ν and every N≥1, ν=∑n<NδbQn+νQN, where Qn are powers of the substochastic matrix Q. Induct on N from step 1.3; each reassociation of the countable nonnegative matrix sums is justified by [F4]. By step 2.2 and the zero b-coordinate in step 1.1, αn=δbQn with α0=δb, so the first sum is the Nth partial sum of the series in step 1.2.

3.5F1step 1.1step 2.3given

The time-0 term contributes μb(b)=1 although no return has occurred, since the occupation sum starts at n=0 while the return time is strictly positive.

4.1F1step 3.2given

If b is transient then (μbp)(b)=Pb(Tb+<∞)<1 by step 3.2, so item 4 genuinely uses recurrence; item 3's minimality inequality remains valid.

4.2step 1.2step 3.4given

Letting N→∞ in step 3.4 gives ν(y)≥sup⁡N≥1∑n<Nαn(y)=μb(y) for every y, since the remainder νQN(y) is nonnegative and a nonnegative series is the supremum of its partial sums; this is the asserted pointwise minimality.

4.3F1step 2.3step 3.3step 3.2given

If b is recurrent then Pb(Tb+<∞)=1, so (μbp)(b)=1=μb(b) by steps 2.3 and 3.2, while step 3.3 gives equality at every y≠b; hence μbp=μb.

5.1A1F3step 1.1step 2.2step 2.5step 4.2given∎

AC [A1] is used through the finite-dimensional-law supplier [F3]; once that chain law is supplied, the recursion and nonnegative summations are finite-time or Tonelli/monotone-convergence calculations with no further choice. The pointwise minimality assertion is one-way, not an if-and-only-if.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources