How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Kac return-time formula for a positive-mass set
Statement
Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice). Let be an irreducible transition matrix on a countable state space with invariant probability , and let be nonempty. With (Hitting, return, and visit times), one has and
where the terms are extended nonnegative numbers; equivalently . For a singleton this recovers the state Kac identity (Kac return-time formula for a state).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, an irreducible countable transition matrix with invariant probability , and a nonempty .
Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; AC is assumed and is used through the positive-recurrence, reversal, and recurrent-class/hitting suppliers [F3]–[F5]. (The Axiom of Choice)
and , with value on the event that the infimum is empty; the initial visit at time zero is not counted by . (Hitting, return, and visit times)
On a countable state space is invariant exactly when for every ; a -chain started in has distributed as . (Invariant and stationary distribution for a Markov kernel)
Assume AC. For an irreducible countable chain with invariant probability : every state is positive recurrent and hence recurrent, all one-step and -step transition probabilities are determined by , and for every . (Positive recurrence and stationary probability for irreducible countable chains)
Assume AC. For a stationary countable chain with law : the reverse kernel is a transition matrix on with invariant, and every finite segment read backward is distributed as a stationary -chain; for every and , a stationary -chain with initial law satisfies . (Time reversal of a stationary Markov chain)
Assume AC. If is recurrent and , then ; recurrence is a class property. (Recurrence and transience are class properties)
For a random variable with values in , , both sides extended nonnegative; this follows by monotone convergence applied to . (Monotone convergence for the integral)
For every double sequence in the order of summation may be interchanged, the two iterated sums being equal even when the common value is . (Tonelli's theorem for double series of nonnegative extended real numbers)
Under the present irreducibility and invariance hypotheses, the state Kac identity is . (Kac return-time formula for a state)
Proof
Given: AC, an irreducible on countable , an invariant probability , a nonempty , and a -chain started in .
Proof technique: identify the probability that the chain starts in and avoids it up to time with the probability that the reversed stationary chain first hits at time , then sum the identity over .
By [F3] every state satisfies , so ; by [F4] the reverse kernel is a transition matrix on with invariant. The -step reverse identity follows by induction on from this definition and the invariance of .
For a nonempty , , since every term is positive by [F3] and the sum is over a nonempty set.
For every , : the events for are disjoint, each carries probability by [F2], and conditional on with the event that avoid is exactly by [F1].
If , then and the formula reduces to .
The reverse chain is irreducible: for irreducibility of gives with , and then the identity of step 1.1 gives .
If , [F4] gives ; if , both and have law . Thus the event in step 1.3 has probability , where .
Since is irreducible and has the invariant probability , [F3] applied to makes it positive recurrent and recurrent; then [F5] gives for all and every fixed .
Summing the identities of steps 1.3 and 2.2 over and using the tail formula [F6] for each nonnegative integer valued gives , the interchange of the two nonnegative sums being [F7].
The value is never evaluated as : it occurs only in the nonnegative expectations and tail probabilities, and step 2.2 reverses a finite segment rather than an infinite path.
The last series is : choosing any , step 3.1 gives for every , hence , and . Therefore , which in particular shows that the weighted sum is finite.
Dividing by the positive number from step 1.2 gives . For the sum has the single term , agreeing with [F8].
The sum in step 3.2 is over nonnegative extended terms, so it assumes no integrability beforehand; finiteness of the weighted sum follows in step 4.1.
A one-state chain is covered by the case in step 1.4, and the singleton formula is the specialization in step 5.1.
AC [A1] is used exactly at the AC-qualified supplier applications in steps 1.1, 2.2, and 3.1; the subsequent nonnegative summation is choice-free.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Time reversal of a stationary Markov chain
- Positive recurrence and stationary probability for irreducible countable chains
- Kac return-time formula for a state
- Recurrence and transience are class properties
- Hitting, return, and visit times
- Invariant and stationary distribution for a Markov kernel
- Monotone convergence for the integral
- Tonelli's theorem for double series of nonnegative extended real numbers
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Levin–Peres–Wilmer, Markov Chains and Mixing Times, second edition, Lemma 21.12 and §21.3 / Appendix C.1 (standard reference, not scraped)