Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Kac return-time formula for a positive-mass set

Statement

Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice). Let p be an irreducible transition matrix on a countable state space E with invariant probability π, and let A⊆E be nonempty. With TA+:=inf⁡{n≥1:Xn∈A} (Hitting, return, and visit times), one has π(A)>0 and

∑x∈Aπ(x) ExTA+=1,

where the terms are extended nonnegative numbers; equivalently Eπ(⋅∣A)TA+=1/π(A). For a singleton A={b} this recovers the state Kac identity π(b)EbTb+=1 (Kac return-time formula for a state).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, an irreducible countable transition matrix p with invariant probability π, and a nonempty A⊆E.

[A1]

Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; AC is assumed and is used through the positive-recurrence, reversal, and recurrent-class/hitting suppliers [F3]–[F5]. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F1]

TA=inf⁡{n≥0:Xn∈A} and TA+=inf⁡{n≥1:Xn∈A}, with value +∞ on the event that the infimum is empty; the initial visit at time zero is not counted by TA+. (Hitting, return, and visit times)

[F2]

On a countable state space π is invariant exactly when π(y)=∑xπ(x)p(x,y) for every y; a p-chain started in π has X0 distributed as π. (Invariant and stationary distribution for a Markov kernel)

[F3]

Assume AC. For an irreducible countable chain with invariant probability π: every state is positive recurrent and hence recurrent, all one-step and n-step transition probabilities are determined by p, and π(x)>0 for every x∈E. (Positive recurrence and stationary probability for irreducible countable chains)

[F4]

Assume AC. For a stationary countable chain with law π: the reverse kernel p∗(x,y)=π(y)p(y,x)/π(x) is a transition matrix on E+={x:π(x)>0} with π invariant, and every finite segment read backward is distributed as a stationary p∗-chain; for every r≥1 and 0≤n0<⋯<nr, a stationary p∗-chain X∗ with initial law π satisfies L(Xnr,…,Xn0)=L(X0∗,Xnr−nr−1∗,…,Xnr−n0∗). (Time reversal of a stationary Markov chain)

[F5]

Assume AC. If x is recurrent and x→y, then Px(Ty<∞)=1; recurrence is a class property. (Recurrence and transience are class properties)

[F6]

For a random variable T with values in {0,1,2,…}∪{+∞}, ET=∑n≥0P(T>n), both sides extended nonnegative; this follows by monotone convergence applied to T=∑n≥01{T>n}. (Monotone convergence for the integral)

[F7]

For every double sequence (aij) in [0,+∞] the order of summation may be interchanged, the two iterated sums being equal even when the common value is +∞. (Tonelli's theorem for double series of nonnegative extended real numbers)

[F8]

Under the present irreducibility and invariance hypotheses, the state Kac identity is π(b)EbTb+=1. (Kac return-time formula for a state)

Proof

Given: AC, an irreducible p on countable E, an invariant probability π, a nonempty A⊆E, and a p-chain started in π.

Proof technique: identify the probability that the chain starts in A and avoids it up to time n with the probability that the reversed stationary chain first hits A at time n, then sum the identity over n.

1.1A1F3F4algebra

By [F3] every state satisfies π(x)>0, so E+={x:π(x)>0}=E; by [F4] the reverse kernel p∗(x,y)=π(y)p(y,x)/π(x) is a transition matrix on E with π invariant. The n-step reverse identity p∗(n)(x,y)=π(y)p(n)(y,x)/π(x) follows by induction on n from this definition and the invariance of π.

1.2A1F3given

For a nonempty A, π(A)=∑x∈Aπ(x)>0, since every term is positive by [F3] and the sum is over a nonempty set.

1.3F1F2given

For every n≥0, Pπ(X0∈A, X1∉A,…,Xn∉A)=∑x∈Aπ(x) Px(TA+>n): the events {X0=x} for x∈A are disjoint, each carries probability π(x) by [F2], and conditional on X0=x with x∈A the event that X1,…,Xn avoid A is exactly {TA+>n} by [F1].

1.4F1given

If A=E, then TA+=1 and the formula reduces to ∑xπ(x)=1.

2.1step 1.1given

The reverse chain is irreducible: for x,y∈E irreducibility of p gives n with p(n)(y,x)>0, and then the identity of step 1.1 gives p∗(n)(x,y)=π(y)p(n)(y,x)/π(x)>0.

2.2A1F2F4step 1.3given

If n≥1, [F4] gives L(Xn,…,X0)=L(X0∗,…,Xn∗); if n=0, both X0 and X0∗ have law π. Thus the event in step 1.3 has probability Pπ∗(X0∗∉A,…,Xn−1∗∉A, Xn∗∈A)=Pπ∗(TA∗=n), where TA∗:=inf⁡{k≥0:Xk∗∈A}.

3.1A1F3F5step 2.1given

Since p∗ is irreducible and has the invariant probability π, [F3] applied to p∗ makes it positive recurrent and recurrent; then [F5] gives Pz∗(Ta<∞)=1 for all z∈E and every fixed a∈E.

3.2F6F7step 1.3step 2.2given

Summing the identities of steps 1.3 and 2.2 over n≥0 and using the tail formula [F6] for each nonnegative integer valued TA+ gives ∑x∈Aπ(x)ExTA+=∑n≥0∑x∈Aπ(x)Px(TA+>n)=∑n≥0Pπ∗(TA∗=n), the interchange of the two nonnegative sums being [F7].

3.3F1F4step 2.2given

The value TA+=+∞ is never evaluated as X∞: it occurs only in the nonnegative expectations and tail probabilities, and step 2.2 reverses a finite segment rather than an infinite path.

4.1step 3.1step 3.2given

The last series is Pπ∗(TA∗<∞)=1: choosing any a∈A, step 3.1 gives Pz∗(Ta<∞)=1 for every z, hence Pπ∗(Ta<∞)=∑zπ(z)Pz∗(Ta<∞)=1, and TA∗≤Ta. Therefore ∑x∈Aπ(x)ExTA+=1, which in particular shows that the weighted sum is finite.

5.1F8step 1.2step 4.1given

Dividing by the positive number π(A) from step 1.2 gives Eπ(⋅∣A)TA+=∑x∈Aπ(x)π(A)ExTA+=1π(A). For A={b} the sum has the single term π(b)EbTb+=1, agreeing with [F8].

5.2F6F7step 3.2step 4.1given

The sum in step 3.2 is over nonnegative extended terms, so it assumes no integrability beforehand; finiteness of the weighted sum follows in step 4.1.

6.1step 5.1step 1.4given

A one-state chain is covered by the case A=E in step 1.4, and the singleton formula is the specialization in step 5.1.

7.1A1step 1.1step 2.2step 3.1given∎

AC [A1] is used exactly at the AC-qualified supplier applications in steps 1.1, 2.2, and 3.1; the subsequent nonnegative summation is choice-free.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources