How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An Eventown family that no further set can be added to has exactly members
Statement
Let be an Eventown family on that is maximal under inclusion among Eventown families on . Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a maximal Eventown family on .
Every Eventown family has at most members (Eventown: distinct with every and every even satisfy ).
For a subspace , one has (For a subspace , , where ).
A -dimensional vector space over has elements (A -dimensional vector space over a field with elements has exactly elements).
If is a nonzero linear map on a finite-dimensional -vector space, then (Rank-nullity: ).
Proof
The family contains and is closed under symmetric difference: if , then is even, and for every the intersection has even size as well; maximality therefore forces .
Hence the set is a subspace of . Every has even size, so the all-ones vector is orthogonal to every and therefore lies in . The Eventown hypotheses give for every ; bilinearity then gives for all . Consequently and .
If , then the subset with incidence vector has even size and even intersection with every member of , so maximality forces and thus . Therefore .
Let . If is odd, then while step 2.1 gives , so the linear map given by is nonzero and has kernel . Hence step 3.1, [L2] and [L4] give , so . If is even, then the whole set has even size and even intersection with every member of , so maximality forces and therefore . Every then satisfies , hence ; step 3.1 gives , and [L2] yields , so . In both cases .
The subspace has elements by [L3], and step 1.1 identified those elements with the members of . The upper bound [L1] is therefore attained by every maximal Eventown family.
Remarks
- Maximality is used only once, in step 3.1, to turn the orthogonality conditions back into actual set membership.
Depends on
- Eventown: distinct $A_1,\dots,A_m\subseteq[n]$ with every $\lvert A_i\rvert$ and every $\lvert A_i\cap A_j\rvert$ even satisfy $m\le 2^{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}$
- For a subspace $U\le F^{n}$, $\dim_F U^{\perp}=n-\dim_F U$, where $U^{\perp}=\{x:\langle x,u\rangle=0\text{ for all }u\in U\}$
- A $d$-dimensional vector space over a field with $q$ elements has exactly $q^{d}$ elements
- The standard bilinear form $\langle x,y\rangle=\sum_{i<n}x_iy_i$ on $F^{n}$
- Linear subspace of a vector space
- The incidence vector $v_A\in F^{n}$ of a subset $A\subseteq[n]$ over a stated field
- For every prime $p$, the two operations on $\mathbb{Z}/p$ make it a field
- Linear map between vector spaces over the same field
- Rank-nullity: $\dim_F V=\operatorname{nullity}T+\operatorname{rank}T$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- L. Babai and P. Frankl, Linear Algebra Methods in Combinatorics, §2.3.2 (standard reference, not scraped)