How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exponential coefficient decay gives a uniform partial-wave truncation bound
Statement
Assume Countable Choice and Dependent Choice. Let for every integer , where is defined in Spherical harmonics and partial-wave conventions in three dimensions. Suppose constants and satisfy for all . Then converges uniformly on , and for every integer , This is a conditional angular-coefficient bound; it does not assert exponential decay for general scattering data.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The harmonic spaces, constants , , and coefficient bounds above.
Proof
Given: The data in the Statement.
By [F1], . The scalar series of these bounds converges because , so the partial sums of are uniformly Cauchy and converge uniformly to a function .
For with , : squaring reduces this to , whose difference is nonnegative. Therefore the tail in step 1.1 is at most . For , multiplying the geometric series by itself or differentiating its partial sums gives . This yields the claimed bound.
Depends on
- Spherical harmonics and partial-wave conventions in three dimensions
- Spherical harmonics form a complete basis with the addition formula
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pierre Capel, Introduction to Scattering Theory, TALENT lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Maximilian Kreuzer, Quantum Theory: Lecture Notes, version July 15, 2009, Chapter 8 (standard reference, not scraped)