Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Causal feedback does not increase finite DMC capacity under average cost

Statement

For every finite DMC and finite nonnegative letter cost with feasible budget Γ, the feedback operational capacity Cfb(Γ) defined in Causal feedback codes for a finite cost-constrained DMC equals the ordinary average-error capacity C(Γ) in Average-cost fixed-length codes and operational DMC capacity. Thus Cfb(Γ)=CI(Γ).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite DMC, its finite letter cost, a feasible budget, and a causal deterministic feedback code with message count M and uniform random message U∈[M].

[A1]

Causal feedback codes for a finite cost-constrained DMC: at each time t, Xt=ft(U,Yt−1) and the conditional output row is W(⋅∣Xt); the cost is expected average letter cost.

[F1]

Finite entropy and mutual-information chain rules: mutual information expands as I(U;Yn)=∑tI(U;Yt∣Yt−1).

[F2]

Data processing for a finite Markov chain, with equality condition: conditionally on a history h, the finite Markov relation U→Xt→Yt implies I(U;Yt∣Yt−1=h)≤I(Xt;Yt∣Yt−1=h).

[F3]

Finite DMC with a nonnegative input cost and feasible budget and Constrained DMC information capacity is attained, nondecreasing, and concave: CI(u) is nondecreasing and concave for u≥cmin⁡ and satisfies 0≤CI(u)≤ln⁡∣X∣.

[F4]

Jensen's inequality for an integrable cost random variable: for an integrable random cost V≥cmin⁡ and finite concave f, Ef(V)≤f(EV).

[F5]

Finite-alphabet Fano inequality: for M≥2, the decoder U^=g(Yn) with error e=Pr⁡[U^≠U] satisfies H(U∣U^)≤h2(e)+eln⁡(M−1).

[F6]

Average-cost capacity formula for a finite DMC: the ordinary capacity equals CI(Γ).

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F3givenalgebra

For each time t and each positive-probability history h=yt−1, the causal encoder and memoryless channel give the finite Markov chain U→Xt→Yt. By chain rule [F1] and data processing [F2], I(U;Yn)≤∑t=1nEYt−1CI(E[c(Xt)∣Yt−1]), applying the definition of CI to each conditional input law, whose cost is at least cmin⁡.

2.1F3F4step 1.1givenalgebra

Give a uniform random index T∈[n] independent of the code and set V=E[c(XT)∣T,YT−1]. Then V≥cmin⁡, EV=n−1∑tEc(Xt)≤Γ, and CI(V) is integrable by [F3]. Applying [F4] and monotonicity in [F3] to step 1.1 yields I(U;Yn)≤nECI(V)≤nCI(EV)≤nCI(Γ).

3.1F5F6step 2.1givenalgebracases∎

If M=1, the rate is zero. If M≥2, the relaxed Fano bound [F5] and the deterministic decoder imply (1−e)ln⁡M≤I(U;Yn)+ln⁡2≤nCI(Γ)+ln⁡2. Thus reliable feedback rates are at most CI(Γ)=C(Γ) by [F6]. Every ordinary feasible code is a feedback code whose encoders ignore past outputs, so Cfb(Γ)≥C(Γ); the reverse inequality follows from the converse.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources