How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The finite Thom detector is an integral homology isomorphism below 2r−1
Statement
Assume AC. For f_r:T_r→P_r, f_{r*}:H_i(T_r;Z)→H_i(P_r;Z) is an isomorphism for i<2r−1 and a surjection for i=2r−1. No endpoint injectivity is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC; a rank ; the detector ; ; and the integral singular-chain mapping cone of .
The mod-two comparison identifies the mod-two cohomology of source and target through degree (The finite Thom detector is a mod-two cohomology isomorphism below 2r), and the away-from-two Thom and calculations give rational and odd-primary vanishing of both reduced cohomologies below (Unoriented Thom cohomology away from two and its strict endpoint, Finite type and odd-primary acyclicity of K(F₂,q)).
The source and target have finitely generated integral homology and the cone has finitely generated homology with a degreewise split exact sequence (Integral finite generation of universal real and oriented Thom homology, Finite products and comparison cones have homological finite type); the finite-generation cohomological-UCT comparison converts vanishing field cohomology into vanishing cone homology (Finite-generation cohomological UCT gives integral cone comparison); AC underlies the field choices (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Set D=2r−1. The finite-type lemma and the away-from-two Thom theorem prove that for every field F of characteristic different from two, both reduced cohomology groups H̃^i(T_r;F) and H̃^i(P_r;F) vanish for 0<i<2r. In degree zero both spaces are connected, so the ordinary H⁰ map is also an isomorphism. The mod-two comparison above proves the F₂ cohomology isomorphism through every degree k≤D. Therefore f_r^* is an isomorphism in ordinary cohomology for F=Q and every F_p, in all degrees 0≤i≤D.
Let C_f be the integral singular-chain mapping cone of f_r. The integral finite-generation theorem and the finite-product cone lemma prove H_i(T_r;Z) and H_i(P_r;Z) are finitely generated, so its cone long exact sequence makes H_i(C_f) finitely generated in every degree. The cone is free degreewise as an abelian chain complex. For each field F, the degreewise-split cone cochain sequence gives H^{i−1}(P_r;F)→H^{i−1}(T_r;F)→H^i(Hom(C_f,F)) →H^i(P_r;F)→H^i(T_r;F). The adjacent cohomology isomorphisms force H^i(Hom(C_f,F))=0 for 0≤i≤D (with negative groups zero at i=0). The cohomological UCT over Z surjects this zero group onto Hom(H_i(C_f),F). Thus Hom(H_i(C_f),Q)=0 and Hom(H_i(C_f),F_p)=0 for every prime p. A finitely generated abelian group with all these Hom groups zero is zero: Q detects any nonzero free summand, and F_p detects any nonzero p-primary cyclic summand. Therefore H_i(C_f)=0 for i≤D. The integral cone exact sequence yields the stated isomorphism for i<D and surjection at D.
f_{r*} is an isomorphism for i<D=2r−1, f_{r*} is surjective for i=D=2r−1. This is exactly the endpoint needed below. It gives no injectivity assertion at degree 2r−1 and uses no comparison at or beyond 2r. The proof is the application of the finite-generation cohomological-UCT comparison; the finite-product cone computation independently records the same strict conclusion.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Finite Thom classifying detector map
- The finite Thom detector is a mod-two cohomology isomorphism below 2r
- Finite type and odd-primary acyclicity of K(F₂,q)
- Unoriented Thom cohomology away from two and its strict endpoint
- Integral finite generation of universal real and oriented Thom homology
- Finite products and comparison cones have homological finite type
- Finite-generation cohomological UCT gives integral cone comparison
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
70 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tom Weston, An Introduction to Cobordism Theory (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Milnor and James Stasheff, Characteristic Classes (standard reference, not scraped)