How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite Thom classifying detector map
Definition
Assume AC. Let be the mod-two square algebra acting on , let be its positive-degree ideal, and put as in the freeness theorem. Fix once and for all a homogeneous basis of and a degree-preserving section of the quotient map, using AC; these choices are shared by every rank. For set and . For each , set . The freeness theorem makes all , for , a homogeneous free -basis of . Via the eventual-constancy isomorphism , let be the rank-r coordinate of the same fixed , and choose a based representative of its representing class. Set and define the candidate based detector by its coordinate maps. The same basis and lifts are used at every rank, so the coordinates are compatible with prespectrum stabilization. The finite existence and continuity argument is recorded in The finite Thom classifying detector map exists and is continuous ↗.
The construction fixes one global homogeneous -basis of and one degree-preserving section of the quotient map, used at every rank; a given detector sees only the finite initial segment . The freeness theorem identifies the lifts as a free -basis of , and the eventual-constancy lemma identifies each stable class with its rank- coordinate whenever . The finiteness of , the existence of the based representing maps , and the continuity of are proved in The finite Thom classifying detector map exists and is continuous ↗. The same basis and lifts are used in every rank, so no new choice enters the suspension-compatibility computation.
Depends on
- Stable unoriented Thom cohomology is free over the square algebra
- Degreewise mod-two cohomology of the universal real Thom prespectrum
- Stable universal Thom cohomology is eventually constant in every degree
- Eilenberg--Mac Lane spaces represent singular cohomology
- The Axiom of Choice
- A map into a product is continuous iff each of its components is; the projections are continuous and open; and each projection is surjective when every factor is nonempty, which for an infinite index set uses the Axiom of Choice
- The mod-two square algebra, admissible sequences, and excess
Used by
- Stable Thom detector coordinates commute with suspension Lemma
- The finite Thom classifying detector map exists and is continuous Lemma
- The finite Thom detector is a homotopy isomorphism through 2r−2 Theorem
- The finite Thom detector is a mod-two cohomology isomorphism below 2r Theorem
- The finite Thom detector is an integral homology isomorphism below 2r−1 Theorem
- Thom's theorem: Stiefel-Whitney numbers detect unoriented bordism Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tom Weston, An Introduction to Cobordism Theory (standard reference, not scraped)