Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The finite Thom detector is a homotopy isomorphism through 2r−2

Statement

Assume AC. For r≥2, f_r induces π_i(T_r)≅π_i(P_r) for 1≤i≤2r−2. On π_{r+n}, for 0≤n≤r−2, the target is F₂^{B_n} and its coordinates are evaluation on the chosen stable Thom classes.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; a rank r≥2; the detector fr:Tr→Pr; and the target Pr, a finite product of Eilenberg–Mac Lane spaces K(F2,r+db).

[F2]

The arbitrary-target finite-range comparison replaces the target by a relative CW approximation and applies the simply connected CW comparison with N=2r−1 (Finite-range comparison with an arbitrary simply connected target, Integral homology comparison gives finite-range homotopy comparison for simply connected CW complexes), using the integral homology isomorphism below 2r−1 and surjection at 2r−1 (The finite Thom detector is an integral homology isomorphism below 2r−1).

[F3]

Eilenberg–Mac Lane representability identifies the coordinate evaluations of the detector (Eilenberg--Mac Lane spaces represent singular cohomology); AC underlies the model choices (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F2

By the connectivity lemma, Tr is a simply connected CW complex. The target P_r is a finite product of K(F₂,q) with q≥r≥2, hence path-connected and simply connected; we do not assume its ordinary product topology is a CW topology. Apply the arbitrary-target extension by relative CW approximation to replace fr by a CW extension pair, then the integral homology-to-homotopy comparison theorem with N=2r−1. The integral comparison supplies the exact homology hypotheses, so fr induces πi isomorphisms for 1≤i<N, namely through 2r−2. The same comparison also gives surjectivity at π2r−1; only the isomorphisms through 2r−2 are needed here, and no conclusion at π2r is supplied.

2.1step 1.1F1F3∎

A factor K(F₂,r+d_b) has its only nonzero positive homotopy group F₂ in degree r+d_b. Coordinatewise homotopy groups of a finite product are the products of the factor groups, as proved in the finite-product homotopy computation. Hence at i=r+n the target is F₂^{B_n}. The induced coordinate on a sphere class [α:S^{r+n}→T_r] is ⟨m_{r,b}, α_*[S^{r+n}]{F₂}⟩ = ⟨α^*m{r,b},[S^{r+n}]_{F₂}⟩, by representability and the normalized fundamental class. The cutoff i≤2r−2 is equivalent to r≥n+2.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

53 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources