How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Stable unoriented Thom homotopy is injectively detected
Statement
Assume AC. For each n≥0, the stable group π_n(MO)=colim_r π_{r+n}(T_r) maps injectively to V_n=F₂^{B_n} by the compatible detector coordinates D_{r,n}, using the cofinal tail r≥n+2.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC; a stable degree ; the stable group over the cofinal tail ; the compatible detector coordinates of the suspension-compatibility lemma; and the target .
The finite-range theorem makes each an isomorphism for , and the suspension-compatibility lemma gives with identity target bonding maps (The finite Thom detector is a homotopy isomorphism through 2r−2, Stable Thom detector coordinates commute with suspension).
The stable homotopy colimit is computed over any cofinal tail (Stable homotopy groups of a sequential prespectrum, Stable homotopy colimits are independent of a cofinal tail); AC fixes the global basis defining the coordinates (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
With the fixed target , the target bonding maps are identities, and the finite-range theorem makes each an isomorphism on every rank . The cofinal-tail lemma then yields injectivity of the colimit map.
Explicitly, represent a stable class at a rank r≥n+2. If its detector is zero, compatibility makes its detector zero at every later rank; injectivity of D_{s,n} then makes the advanced source representative zero, so the colimit class was zero. This proves the stable conclusion without assuming stabilization is an isomorphism in advance. In fact, because each D_{r,n} is an isomorphism and the square commutes, the bonding maps are isomorphisms on this tail, but this stronger consequence is not needed for injectivity.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Daniel S. Freed, Bordism: Old and New (standard reference, not scraped)