How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Thom's theorem: Stiefel-Whitney numbers detect unoriented bordism
Statement
Assume AC. Let and be closed smooth -manifolds. Then and are unoriented-cobordant if and only if all of their Stiefel-Whitney numbers agree; equivalently, is null-cobordant if and only if every Stiefel-Whitney number of vanishes. Consequently the map , , is injective, and the unoriented bordism ring is detected by the Stiefel-Whitney numbers. (The 'only if' direction is the invariance theorem; the content is the converse, due to Thom.)
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Closed smooth -manifolds , the unoriented bordism classes of Unoriented and oriented bordism groups, the Stiefel-Whitney numbers of Stiefel-Whitney numbers of a closed manifold, and the stable Thom prespectrum data of The Thom prespectrum of the universal real and oriented bundles.
Characteristic numbers are cobordism invariants and All characteristic numbers vanish on null-cobordant manifolds: unoriented-cobordant closed -manifolds have equal Stiefel-Whitney numbers, and a null-cobordant closed manifold has all of them zero; Null-cobordant closed manifolds identifies null-cobordism with the zero class of .
Pontryagin-Thom converts bordism detection to a Thom-space homotopy problem assigns with null-cobordant if and only if , expresses the Stiefel-Whitney numbers as the evaluations of the universal classes on , and records that the degreewise inverse substitution is involutive.
Stable universal Thom cohomology is eventually constant in every degree identifies with the homogeneous degree- polynomials in the universal normal Stiefel-Whitney classes times the Thom class, and Finite Thom classifying detector map chooses the finite detector coordinates from this space, so each coordinate is a finite linear combination of normal-class monomials times .
Stable unoriented Thom homotopy is injectively detected: for each the detector map from to the finite product of coordinate groups is injective on the cofinal tail , with coordinates commuting with the fixed-coordinate structure maps. Disjoint union makes bordism classes abelian groups gives in and the componentwise additivity of the numbers, and The Axiom of Choice is assumed exactly as declared by these suppliers.
Proof
The only-if direction. If and are unoriented-cobordant then all their Stiefel-Whitney numbers agree by [F1], and a null-cobordant manifold has all numbers zero by [F1]; this is the easy half of both formulations.
The converse: vanishing numbers force the Thom class to be zero. Suppose every Stiefel-Whitney number of vanishes. By [F2] the Pontryagin-Thom class determines null-cobordism, and for a large representative rank the numbers are the evaluations . By [F3] every detector coordinate in degree is a finite linear combination of normal-class monomials of degree , and each such normal monomial is, by the degreewise inverse substitution of [F2] (which is involutive), a finite linear combination of the tangent-number functionals . Hence every detector coordinate evaluates to zero on , since each of those functionals evaluates to a Stiefel-Whitney number and all of them vanish by hypothesis.
Zero detector implies null-cobordism. The detector coordinates are compatible with the fixed-coordinate structure maps and injective on the cofinal tail by [F4]. Since step 1.2 shows that all coordinates of vanish at a representative rank in that tail, injectivity gives ; by [F2] the manifold is null-cobordant. The argument uses the batch-30 Steenrod/Thom module-coalgebra and free-generator construction, the strict mod-two comparison, the finite-generation comparison through the universal-coefficient cone, the relative Hurewicz range, and the proved suspension compatibility through their supplier chain; no unstable dimension count or integral/mod-two identification replaces those inputs.
Equality of numbers and injectivity. For closed -manifolds , the numbers of the disjoint union satisfy in by the componentwise definition [F1], and in the unoriented bordism group [F4]. Hence all numbers of and agree if and only if all numbers of vanish, if and only if is null-cobordant by step 2.1, if and only if , if and only if . Therefore the coordinate map is well defined and injective in every degree, so the unoriented bordism ring is detected by the Stiefel-Whitney numbers; no polynomial presentation of that ring is asserted.
Degree zero and empty case. For the sole monomial is the empty product, whose number is the parity of the cardinality by [F1], the stable group is detected in degree zero through and ranks by [F3] and [F4], and the same argument gives that a finite set is null-cobordant exactly when its cardinality is even. The empty manifold has the zero class in and all numbers zero, consistent with the injectivity of step 3.1. All rank thresholds use the cofinal tail of [F4] and the fixed-coordinate structure maps; no further choice is made.
Depends on
- Pontryagin-Thom converts bordism detection to a Thom-space homotopy problem
- Characteristic numbers are cobordism invariants
- All characteristic numbers vanish on null-cobordant manifolds
- The Thom prespectrum of the universal real and oriented bundles
- Stable universal Thom cohomology is eventually constant in every degree
- Finite Thom classifying detector map
- Stable unoriented Thom homotopy is injectively detected
- Stiefel-Whitney numbers of a closed manifold
- Null-cobordant closed manifolds
- Unoriented and oriented bordism groups
- Disjoint union makes bordism classes abelian groups
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
95 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tom Weston, An Introduction to Cobordism Theory (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Milnor and James Stasheff, Characteristic Classes (original pagination; chapters 16-18 of the re-typeset scan) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Daniel S. Freed, Bordism: Old and New (lecture notes, UT Austin, Fall 2012) (standard reference, not scraped)