Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fourier transform of delta constants plane waves and polynomials

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and the negative-sign 2π normalization. For a,bRn and every multi-index α,

Fδa(ξ)=e2πiaξ,F1=δ0,F(e2πibx)=δb,

and

F(αδ0)=(2πiξ)α,F(xα)=(12πi)ααδ0.

Functions in these formulas denote their regular tempered distributions. By linearity, the last identity determines the transform of every polynomial.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, a,bRn, and a multi-index α.

[F1]

Dirac distributions and their derivatives have the bilinear evaluation convention (Dirac delta and its derivatives) and compactly supported distributions are tempered (Compactly supported distributions are tempered).

[F2]

Constants, plane waves, and polynomials are regular tempered distributions (Polynomial growth functions define tempered distributions).

[F3]
[F4]

Fourier differentiation and multiplication have the precise 2π constants and signs (Fourier differentiation and multiplication identities on tempered distributions).

[F5]

The published translation/modulation laws use the same negative-sign normalization (Translation, modulation, linear dilation and reflection laws).

Proof

technique · evaluate delta and use reflection/calculus identities
1.1

Evaluate the transform of δa on an arbitrary φS.

F1F2

Fδa,φ=φ^(a)=e2πiaξφ(ξ)dξ.

Thus Fδa is the displayed plane wave; at a=0 this gives Fδ0=1. The sign agrees with [F5]. [F1, F2, F5]

2.1

Apply F to Fδ0=1. Since Rδ0=δ0, [F3] gives F1=δ0. Similarly step 1.1 with a=b gives Fδb=e2πibx, so applying F once more gives F(e2πibx)=Rδb=δb.

F3step 1.1
3.1

Apply the derivative identity in [F4] to δ0 and use Fδ0=1 to obtain F(αδ0)=(2πiξ)α. Apply the multiplication identity to the constant distribution and use F1=δ0 to obtain the formula for xα.

F4step 2.1
4.1

Every polynomial is a finite complex linear combination of monomials, so linearity completes the polynomial assertion. The zero multi-index recovers Fδ0=1 and F1=δ0. Countable Choice is used only through the published Fourier suppliers.

step 3.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources