How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Translation, modulation, linear dilation and reflection laws
Statement
Assume countable choice. For , , and invertible real matrix , put and . Then, at every frequency, Also and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The stated data and The Axiom of Countable Choice (); translation has the convention of Translation of a function on .
The transform is defined on classes at every frequency (The integral transform is representative independent).
The complex change-of-variables formula for a diffeomorphism uses the absolute Jacobian determinant, under countable choice (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions).
Exponentials satisfy the addition law (, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential).
Proof
The maps and are diffeomorphisms of the open set , with determinants and . Applying F2 to proves and ; unit modulus gives . These operations preserve null equivalence, by the same substitution applied to indicators of null sets (or directly by its null-set proof). Countable choice is precisely the assumption inherited from this Lebesgue substitution interface.
Substituting in the absolutely convergent translation integral gives . Combining exponential factors in the modulation integral gives , hence the modulation formula.
Substituting gives and , proving the dilation formula. For its determinant has absolute value one, proving reflection even when orientation is reversed. Finally conjugate the componentwise integral for : conjugation commutes with its real and imaginary integrals and sends to . This proves the last identity. All equalities are pointwise because F1 gives absolute convergence at each frequency.
Depends on
- The integral transform is representative independent
- A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions
- $\exp(z+w)=\exp z\,\exp w$, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential
- Translation of a function on $\mathbb{R}^n$
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
- There is no universal Riemann–Lebesgue decay rate Counterexample
- Carleson tiles wave packets and tile order Definition
- Momentum operator under the Fourier transform Example
- Poisson kernel transform and Abel summability on the line Example
- Scaled and tensor Gaussian examples Example
- Gaussian smoothing of finite measures Lemma
- Gaussian summability kernels Lemma
- Fourier transform turns L1 convolution into multiplication Theorem
- Heisenberg uncertainty and Gaussian equality Theorem
- L1 Fourier inversion with an integrable transform Theorem
- Riemann–Lebesgue lemma Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Semyon Dyatlov, MIT 18.155 (2022) (standard reference, not scraped)